From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@gmail.com>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>,
jslaby@suse.cz, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, adobriyan@gmail.com, mingo@elte.hu,
peterz@infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: use kmalloc() to allocate fdmem if possible
Date: Mon, 03 May 2010 11:49:40 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BDE8E24.5050200@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m2l412e6f7f1005030052ka39a33ceke8c6b61553ba007f@mail.gmail.com>
On 05/03/2010 10:52 AM, Changli Gao wrote:
> On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Avi Kivity<avi@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> On 05/03/2010 10:05 AM, Changli Gao wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Avi Kivity<avi@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> My point is, vmalloc() and vfree should do this, not their callers:
>>>>
>>>> vmalloc(size):
>>>> if (size<= PAGE_SIZE)
>>>> return kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> vfree(p):
>>>> if (!is_vmalloc_addr(p) {
>>>> kfree(p);
>>>> return;
>>>> }
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I think we should not change vmalloc/vfree, and you can invent new
>>> memory APIs, such as malloc()/free().
>>>
>>>
>> Why?
>>
>>
> Because vmalloc is used to allocate virtually contiguous memory. v in
> vmalloc means virtually.
>
>
A kmalloc()ed page is virtually contiguous, satisfying your requirement.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-03 8:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2010-05-02 16:46 ` [PATCH] fs: use kmalloc() to allocate fdmem if possible Changli Gao
2010-05-02 17:31 ` Avi Kivity
2010-05-03 0:15 ` Tetsuo Handa
2010-05-03 6:06 ` Avi Kivity
2010-05-03 7:05 ` Changli Gao
2010-05-03 7:42 ` Avi Kivity
2010-05-03 7:52 ` Changli Gao
2010-05-03 8:49 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2010-05-03 9:03 ` Jiri Slaby
2010-05-03 9:18 ` Avi Kivity
2010-05-03 9:22 ` Jiri Slaby
2010-05-03 9:25 ` Jiri Slaby
2010-05-03 9:28 ` Avi Kivity
2010-05-03 9:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-03 9:19 ` Jiri Slaby
2010-05-03 9:29 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-04 4:20 ` Changli Gao
2010-05-04 5:33 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BDE8E24.5050200@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=xiaosuo@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).