From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Boaz Harrosh Subject: Re: [RFC] exofs: New truncate sequence Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 13:26:30 +0300 Message-ID: <4C04E056.3080509@panasas.com> References: <4C03ABCA.4050602@panasas.com> <20100531134453.GI9453@laptop> <4C03C40E.2090800@panasas.com> <20100531143337.GK9453@laptop> <4C03CC99.7030404@panasas.com> <20100531150957.GM9453@laptop> <4C03D399.5030408@panasas.com> <20100601100825.GB31911@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Nick Piggin , linux-fsdevel , open-osd To: Christoph Hellwig Return-path: Received: from daytona.panasas.com ([67.152.220.89]:43261 "EHLO daytona.int.panasas.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755700Ab0FAK0d (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jun 2010 06:26:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100601100825.GB31911@lst.de> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 06/01/2010 01:08 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 06:19:53PM +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote: >> You mean pick them from the mailing-list. But then there is no chance >> for them to go into linux-next and pick up some testing. That's why >> I thought on rebasing on Linus-2.6.35-rc1. >> >> Then when Christoph's patches get picked by Al I'll rebase. But the >> base is just good right now and I'd like some exposure for this. >> >> Christoph this is your call > > In the end it really depends on Al. If you want to push your patches > out ASAP feel free to do it and I can rebase easily. > Imagine my surprise when this morning I see that all of Al's patches are in mainline. (that was sarcastic, Stupid me they where there yesterday) So I'm posting a final version of this patch. It runs over 2.6.35-rc1 and works really well and I like this patch a lot. I'm putting it in osd/linux-next. Please advise: Should I ask Linus to pull this in for current Kernel? If not, then I'll ask Al to put it in his tree for 2.6.36 and you can rebase over his tree. Thanks Boaz