From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Boaz Harrosh Subject: Re: [RFC] exofs: New truncate sequence Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 14:05:35 +0300 Message-ID: <4C04E97F.8060001@panasas.com> References: <4C03ABCA.4050602@panasas.com> <20100531134453.GI9453@laptop> <4C03C40E.2090800@panasas.com> <20100531143337.GK9453@laptop> <4C03CC99.7030404@panasas.com> <20100531150957.GM9453@laptop> <4C03D399.5030408@panasas.com> <20100601100825.GB31911@lst.de> <4C04E056.3080509@panasas.com> <20100601104454.GB2057@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Nick Piggin , linux-fsdevel , open-osd To: Christoph Hellwig Return-path: Received: from daytona.panasas.com ([67.152.220.89]:39512 "EHLO daytona.int.panasas.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752240Ab0FALFi (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jun 2010 07:05:38 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100601104454.GB2057@lst.de> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 06/01/2010 01:44 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 01:26:30PM +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote: >> Imagine my surprise when this morning I see that all of Al's patches >> are in mainline. (that was sarcastic, Stupid me they where there yesterday) >> >> So I'm posting a final version of this patch. It runs over 2.6.35-rc1 >> and works really well and I like this patch a lot. I'm putting it >> in osd/linux-next. >> >> Please advise: Should I ask Linus to pull this in for current Kernel? >> If not, then I'll ask Al to put it in his tree for 2.6.36 and you can >> rebase over his tree. > > With the other changes I have you'll be much better off rebasing > ontop of my series as it will make your life easier. But if you're > eager to push it out please do it ASAP. > I would prefer to push it, because it will be much easier for me when juggling with the pnfs tree, Which is based on 2.6.35-rc1. Thanks Boaz