From: "Justin P. Mattock" <justinmattock@gmail.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-audit@redhat.com,
zippel@linux-m68k.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
rusty@rustcorp.com.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6]kernel:audit.c Fix warning: variable 'nlh' set but not used
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 06:29:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C1CC623.7050303@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimqF_gsNxddtUIjQwBaju2N4B7FyNTXoy5RArk4@mail.gmail.com>
On 06/19/2010 01:06 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 06:45, Justin P. Mattock
> <justinmattock@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> This is not dead code. NLMSG_NEW() sets up an nlmsg in ab->skb.
>>> If you remove the code, it's no longer initialized.
>>
>> I played around with this code some more, but am still getting confused with
>> nlmsg_new and NLMSG_NEW. if I remove the nlmsghdr struct I can get a clean
>
> nlmsg_new() allocates a new nlmsg.
> NLMSG_NEW() initializes a nlmsg inside an already allocated skbuff.
>
o.k.. now I see what those two are doing a bit better now nlmsg_new
is the start of a netlink messg, and NLMSG_NEW is a new netlink messg
thats already been started.
>> build without a warning, but still am a bit confused.
>>
>> here is an updated patch let me know if it still needs work..
>> or if it's legit I can resend this.
>
> Looks OK to me, thanks!
>
I'll resend it out with the proper subject, and proper intro to it.
>> From 7515a08ba921d3beed33fa5c6b1fbe59cf52e069 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Justin P. Mattock<justinmattock@gmail.com>
>> Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 19:44:30 -0700
>> Subject: [PATCH 4/4] audit
>> Signed-off-by: Justin P. Mattock<justinmattock@gmail.com>
>>
>> ---
>> kernel/audit.c | 3 +--
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/audit.c b/kernel/audit.c
>> index c71bd26..1d51258 100644
>> --- a/kernel/audit.c
>> +++ b/kernel/audit.c
>> @@ -1041,7 +1041,6 @@ static struct audit_buffer * audit_buffer_alloc(struct
>> audit_context *ctx,
>> {
>> unsigned long flags;
>> struct audit_buffer *ab = NULL;
>> - struct nlmsghdr *nlh;
>>
>> spin_lock_irqsave(&audit_freelist_lock, flags);
>> if (!list_empty(&audit_freelist)) {
>> @@ -1065,7 +1064,7 @@ static struct audit_buffer * audit_buffer_alloc(struct
>> audit_context *ctx,
>> if (!ab->skb)
>> goto nlmsg_failure;
>>
>> - nlh = NLMSG_NEW(ab->skb, 0, 0, type, 0, 0);
>> + NLMSG_NEW(ab->skb, 0, 0, type, 0, 0);
>>
>> return ab;
>>
>> --
>> 1.7.1.rc1.21.gf3bd6
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
> -- Linus Torvalds
>
thanks for taking the time to look at this.
Justin P. Mattock
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-19 13:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-11 20:41 [PATCH 0/6] Fix gcc warnings of unused variables etc Justin P. Mattock
2010-06-11 20:41 ` [PATCH 1/6]scripts:conf.c Fix warning: variable 'type' set but not used Justin P. Mattock
2010-06-11 22:19 ` Michal Marek
2010-06-11 22:24 ` Justin P. Mattock
2010-06-11 20:41 ` [PATCH 2/6]kernel:audit.c Fix warning: variable 'nlh' " Justin P. Mattock
2010-06-11 21:14 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2010-06-11 22:03 ` Justin P. Mattock
2010-06-19 4:45 ` Justin P. Mattock
2010-06-19 8:06 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2010-06-19 13:29 ` Justin P. Mattock [this message]
2010-06-11 20:41 ` [PATCH 3/6]cifs Fix variable not set warnings Justin P. Mattock
2010-06-20 13:22 ` Alessandro Guido
2010-06-20 13:29 ` Justin P. Mattock
2010-06-11 20:41 ` [PATCH 4/6]hfs Fix variable set but not used Justin P. Mattock
2010-06-11 20:41 ` [PATCH 5/6]kernel:module.c variable 'nowarn' " Justin P. Mattock
2010-06-11 21:17 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2010-06-11 22:06 ` Justin P. Mattock
2010-06-19 5:04 ` Justin P. Mattock
2010-06-19 8:08 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2010-06-19 13:41 ` Justin P. Mattock
2010-06-19 19:10 ` Justin P. Mattock
2010-06-19 19:45 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2010-06-19 20:10 ` Justin P. Mattock
2010-06-19 20:23 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2010-06-19 20:26 ` Justin P. Mattock
2010-06-11 20:41 ` [PATCH 6/6]afs:fsclient.c Fix variable 'bp' " Justin P. Mattock
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C1CC623.7050303@gmail.com \
--to=justinmattock@gmail.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).