From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ulrich Drepper Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] add f_flags to struct statfs(64) Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 02:59:21 -0700 Message-ID: <4C29C3F9.7030805@redhat.com> References: <20100626093507.GB26371@lst.de> <60FB0305-A632-4A63-9BD8-DA07CC69B7D7@dilger.ca> <4C28FD98.1010300@redhat.com> <20100629085759.GN28364@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Andreas Dilger , Christoph Hellwig , viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Nick Piggin Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:59202 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754116Ab0F2J7d (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jun 2010 05:59:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100629085759.GN28364@laptop> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 06/29/2010 01:57 AM, Nick Piggin wrote: > ST_VALID is required to differentiate between no flags, and > flags field unsupported of course. Not needed if a new syscall would be used. > At least from 2.4.0 does memset it. 2.2.26 does not. Can you > live with that? We still support building glibc for everything from linux 2.0 on, at least for x86. I really have no idea whether such old kernels are stil= l in use and if yes, whether userland gets updated. I wouldn't have a problem with bumping the minimum required kernel version. - --=20 =E2=9E=A7 Ulrich Drepper =E2=9E=A7 Red Hat, Inc. =E2=9E=A7 444 Castro S= t =E2=9E=A7 Mountain View, CA =E2=9D=96 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkwpw/kACgkQ2ijCOnn/RHT02gCcCOGJj/fr/WCHJpuJ8CYVMKRu KhwAoKXX7L5sDXTk8g6CZdIHL0y7S+i4 =3DtlZM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel= " in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html