From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Scott Lovenberg Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/09] cifs: local caching support using FS-Cache Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 13:41:19 -0400 Message-ID: <4C3DF6BF.3070001@gmail.com> References: <1278333663-30464-1-git-send-email-sjayaraman@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Steve French , linux-cifs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-cachefs-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, David Howells To: Suresh Jayaraman Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1278333663-30464-1-git-send-email-sjayaraman-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-cifs-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On 7/5/2010 8:41 AM, Suresh Jayaraman wrote: > This patchset is a second try at adding persistent, local caching facility for > CIFS using the FS-Cache interface. > > Just wondering, have you bench marked this at all? I'd be interested to see how this compares (performance and scaling) to an oplock-centric design. I'd hazard a guess that with pipelining support in SMB2 the performance will be even better since you can have a hot cache and more requests in flight.