From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: Wang Sheng-Hui <crosslonelyover@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors <kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 RESEND] fix return value for mb_cache_shrink_fn when nr_to_scan > 0
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 11:27:21 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C447CE9.20904@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C430830.9020903@gmail.com>
On 07/18/2010 08:57 AM, Wang Sheng-Hui wrote:
> Sorry to resend this patch. For the 2nd patch should
> be applied after this patch, I just send them together.
>
> Following is the explanation of the patch:
> The comment for struct shrinker in include/linux/mm.h says
> "shrink...It should return the number of objects which remain in the
> cache."
> Please notice the word "remain".
>
> In fs/mbcache.h, mb_cache_shrink_fn is used as the shrink function:
> static struct shrinker mb_cache_shrinker = {
> .shrink = mb_cache_shrink_fn,
> .seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS,
> };
> In mb_cache_shrink_fn, the return value for nr_to_scan > 0 is the
> number of mb_cache_entry before shrink operation. It may because the
> memory usage for mbcache is low, so the effect is not so obvious.
>
> Per Eric Sandeen, we should do the counting only once.
> Per Christoph Hellwig, we should use list_for_each_entry instead of
> list_for_each here.
>
> Following patch is against 2.6.35-rc4. Please check it.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Wang Sheng-Hui <crosslonelyover@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Thanks,
-Eric
> ---
> fs/mbcache.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
> 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/mbcache.c b/fs/mbcache.c
> index ec88ff3..5697d9e 100644
> --- a/fs/mbcache.c
> +++ b/fs/mbcache.c
> @@ -201,21 +201,13 @@ mb_cache_shrink_fn(int nr_to_scan, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> {
> LIST_HEAD(free_list);
> struct list_head *l, *ltmp;
> + struct mb_cache *cache;
> int count = 0;
>
> - spin_lock(&mb_cache_spinlock);
> - list_for_each(l, &mb_cache_list) {
> - struct mb_cache *cache =
> - list_entry(l, struct mb_cache, c_cache_list);
> - mb_debug("cache %s (%d)", cache->c_name,
> - atomic_read(&cache->c_entry_count));
> - count += atomic_read(&cache->c_entry_count);
> - }
> mb_debug("trying to free %d entries", nr_to_scan);
> - if (nr_to_scan == 0) {
> - spin_unlock(&mb_cache_spinlock);
> + if (nr_to_scan == 0)
> goto out;
> - }
> +
> while (nr_to_scan-- && !list_empty(&mb_cache_lru_list)) {
> struct mb_cache_entry *ce =
> list_entry(mb_cache_lru_list.next,
> @@ -229,6 +221,14 @@ mb_cache_shrink_fn(int nr_to_scan, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> e_lru_list), gfp_mask);
> }
> out:
> + spin_lock(&mb_cache_spinlock);
> + list_for_each_entry(cache, &mb_cache_list, c_cache_list) {
> + mb_debug("cache %s (%d)", cache->c_name,
> + atomic_read(&cache->c_entry_count));
> + count += atomic_read(&cache->c_entry_count);
> + }
> + spin_unlock(&mb_cache_spinlock);
> +
> return (count / 100) * sysctl_vfs_cache_pressure;
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-19 16:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-18 13:57 [PATCH 1/2 RESEND] fix return value for mb_cache_shrink_fn when nr_to_scan > 0 Wang Sheng-Hui
2010-07-18 13:58 ` shenghui
2010-07-19 16:27 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2010-07-20 16:49 ` Eric Sandeen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C447CE9.20904@redhat.com \
--to=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=crosslonelyover@gmail.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).