linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Stroetmann <stroetmann@ontolinux.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/20] fs: Implement lazy LRU updates for inodes
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 01:52:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CBCDDD4.3000002@ontolinux.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1287382856-29529-5-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>

  Just only typos

On the 18.10.2010 08:20, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Nick Piggin<npiggin@suse.de>
>
> Convert the inode LRU to use lazy updates to reduce lock and
> cacheline traffic.  We avoid moving inodes around in the LRU list
> during iget/iput operations so these frequent operations don't need
> to access the LRUs. Instead, we defer the refcount checks to
> reclaim-time and use a per-inode state flag, I_REFERENCED, to tell
> reclaim that iget has touched the inode in the past. This means that
> only reclaim should be touching the LRU with any frequency, hence
> significantly reducing lock acquisitions and the amount contention
> on LRU updates.
>
> This also removes the inode_in_use list, which means we now only
> have one list for tracking the inode LRU status. This makes it much
> simpler to split out the LRU list operations under it's own lock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin<npiggin@suse.de>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner<dchinner@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig<hch@lst.de>
> ---
>   fs/fs-writeback.c         |   14 +++---
>   fs/inode.c                |  111 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>   fs/internal.h             |    6 +++
>   include/linux/fs.h        |   13 +++---
>   include/linux/writeback.h |    1 -
>   5 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> index 58a95b7..33e9857 100644
> --- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
> +++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> @@ -408,16 +408,16 @@ writeback_single_inode(struct inode *inode, struct writeback_control *wbc)
>   			 * completion.
>   			 */
>   			redirty_tail(inode);
> -		} else if (atomic_read(&inode->i_count)) {
> -			/*
> -			 * The inode is clean, inuse
> -			 */
> -			list_move(&inode->i_list,&inode_in_use);
>   		} else {
>   			/*
> -			 * The inode is clean, unused
> +			 * The inode is clean. If it is unused, then make sure
> +			 * that it is put on the LRU correctly as iput_final()
> +			 * does not move dirty inodes to the LRU and dirty
> +			 * inodes are removed from the LRU during scanning.
>   			 */
> -			list_move(&inode->i_list,&inode_unused);
> +			list_del_init(&inode->i_list);
> +			if (!atomic_read(&inode->i_count))
> +				inode_lru_list_add(inode);
>   		}
>   	}
>   	inode_sync_complete(inode);
> diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
> index b3b6a4b..bae420e 100644
> --- a/fs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/inode.c
> @@ -72,7 +72,6 @@ static unsigned int i_hash_shift __read_mostly;
>    * allowing for low-overhead inode sync() operations.
>    */
>
> -LIST_HEAD(inode_in_use);
>   LIST_HEAD(inode_unused);
>   static struct hlist_head *inode_hashtable __read_mostly;
>
> @@ -291,6 +290,7 @@ void inode_init_once(struct inode *inode)
>   	INIT_HLIST_NODE(&inode->i_hash);
>   	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&inode->i_dentry);
>   	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&inode->i_devices);
> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&inode->i_list);
>   	INIT_RADIX_TREE(&inode->i_data.page_tree, GFP_ATOMIC);
>   	spin_lock_init(&inode->i_data.tree_lock);
>   	spin_lock_init(&inode->i_data.i_mmap_lock);
> @@ -317,12 +317,21 @@ static void init_once(void *foo)
>    */
>   void __iget(struct inode *inode)
>   {
> -	if (atomic_inc_return(&inode->i_count) != 1)
> -		return;
> +	atomic_inc(&inode->i_count);
> +}
> +
> +void inode_lru_list_add(struct inode *inode)
> +{
> +	list_add(&inode->i_list,&inode_unused);
> +	percpu_counter_inc(&nr_inodes_unused);
> +}
>
> -	if (!(inode->i_state&  (I_DIRTY|I_SYNC)))
> -		list_move(&inode->i_list,&inode_in_use);
> -	percpu_counter_dec(&nr_inodes_unused);
> +void inode_lru_list_del(struct inode *inode)
> +{
> +	if (!list_empty(&inode->i_list)) {
> +		list_del_init(&inode->i_list);
> +		percpu_counter_dec(&nr_inodes_unused);
> +	}
>   }
>
>   void end_writeback(struct inode *inode)
> @@ -367,7 +376,7 @@ static void dispose_list(struct list_head *head)
>   		struct inode *inode;
>
>   		inode = list_first_entry(head, struct inode, i_list);
> -		list_del(&inode->i_list);
> +		list_del_init(&inode->i_list);
>
>   		evict(inode);
>
> @@ -410,9 +419,9 @@ static int invalidate_list(struct list_head *head, struct list_head *dispose)
>   			continue;
>   		invalidate_inode_buffers(inode);
>   		if (!atomic_read(&inode->i_count)) {
> -			list_move(&inode->i_list, dispose);
>   			WARN_ON(inode->i_state&  I_NEW);
>   			inode->i_state |= I_FREEING;
> +			list_move(&inode->i_list, dispose);
>   			percpu_counter_dec(&nr_inodes_unused);
>   			continue;
>   		}
> @@ -447,31 +456,21 @@ int invalidate_inodes(struct super_block *sb)
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(invalidate_inodes);
>
> -static int can_unuse(struct inode *inode)
> -{
> -	if (inode->i_state)
> -		return 0;
> -	if (inode_has_buffers(inode))
> -		return 0;
> -	if (atomic_read(&inode->i_count))
> -		return 0;
> -	if (inode->i_data.nrpages)
> -		return 0;
> -	return 1;
> -}
> -
>   /*
> - * Scan `goal' inodes on the unused list for freeable ones. They are moved to
> - * a temporary list and then are freed outside inode_lock by dispose_list().
> + * Scan `goal' inodes on the unused list for freeable ones. They are moved to a
> + * temporary list and then are freed outside inode_lock by dispose_list().
>    *
>    * Any inodes which are pinned purely because of attached pagecache have their
> - * pagecache removed.  We expect the final iput() on that inode to add it to
> - * the front of the inode_unused list.  So look for it there and if the
> - * inode is still freeable, proceed.  The right inode is found 99.9% of the
> - * time in testing on a 4-way.
> + * pagecache removed.  If the inode has metadata buffers attached to
> + * mapping->private_list then try to remove them.
>    *
> - * If the inode has metadata buffers attached to mapping->private_list then
> - * try to remove them.
> + * If the inode has the I_REFERENCED flag set, it means that it has been used
> + * recently - the flag is set in iput_final(). When we encounter such an inode,
> + * clear the flag and move it to the back of the LRU so it gets another pass
> + * through the LRU before it gets reclaimed. This is necessary because of the
> + * fact we are doing lazy LRU updates to minimise lock contention so the LRU
> + * does not have strict ordering. Hence we don't want to reclaim inodes with
> + * this flag set because they are the inodes that are out of order...
Maybe one point at the end is enough.
>    */
>   static void prune_icache(int nr_to_scan)
>   {
> @@ -489,8 +488,21 @@ static void prune_icache(int nr_to_scan)
>
>   		inode = list_entry(inode_unused.prev, struct inode, i_list);
>
> -		if (inode->i_state || atomic_read(&inode->i_count)) {
> +		/*
> +		 * Referenced or dirty inodes are still in use. Give them
> +		 * another pass through the LRU as we canot reclaim them now.
> +		 */
> +		if (atomic_read(&inode->i_count) ||
> +		    (inode->i_state&  ~I_REFERENCED)) {
> +			list_del_init(&inode->i_list);
> +			percpu_counter_dec(&nr_inodes_unused);
> +			continue;
> +		}
> +
> +		/* recently referenced inodes get one more pass */
> +		if (inode->i_state&  I_REFERENCED) {
>   			list_move(&inode->i_list,&inode_unused);
> +			inode->i_state&= ~I_REFERENCED;
>   			continue;
>   		}
>   		if (inode_has_buffers(inode) || inode->i_data.nrpages) {
> @@ -500,13 +512,19 @@ static void prune_icache(int nr_to_scan)
>   				reap += invalidate_mapping_pages(&inode->i_data,
>   								0, -1);
>   			iput(inode);
> -			spin_lock(&inode_lock);
>
> -			if (inode != list_entry(inode_unused.next,
> -						struct inode, i_list))
> -				continue;	/* wrong inode or list_empty */
> -			if (!can_unuse(inode))
> -				continue;
> +			/*
> +			 * Rather than try to determine if we can still use the
> +			 * inode after calling iput(), leave the inode where it
> +			 * is on the LRU. If we race with another recalimer,
> +			 * that reclaimer will either see the a reference count
see the reference count
> +			 * or the I_REFERENCED flag, and move the inode to the
> +			 * back of the LRU. It we don't race, then we'll see
If we don't
> +			 * the I_REFERENCED flag on the next pass and do the
> +			 * same. Either way, we won't spin on it in this loop.
> +			 */
> +			spin_lock(&inode_lock);
> +			continue;
>   		}
>   		list_move(&inode->i_list,&freeable);
>   		WARN_ON(inode->i_state&  I_NEW);
> @@ -621,7 +639,6 @@ static inline void
>   __inode_add_to_lists(struct super_block *sb, struct hlist_head *head,
>   			struct inode *inode)
>   {
> -	list_add(&inode->i_list,&inode_in_use);
>   	list_add(&inode->i_sb_list,&sb->s_inodes);
>   	if (head)
>   		hlist_add_head(&inode->i_hash, head);
> @@ -1238,10 +1255,12 @@ static void iput_final(struct inode *inode)
>   		drop = generic_drop_inode(inode);
>
>   	if (!drop) {
> -		if (!(inode->i_state&  (I_DIRTY|I_SYNC)))
> -			list_move(&inode->i_list,&inode_unused);
> -		percpu_counter_inc(&nr_inodes_unused);
>   		if (sb->s_flags&  MS_ACTIVE) {
> +			inode->i_state |= I_REFERENCED;
> +			if (!(inode->i_state&  (I_DIRTY|I_SYNC))) {
> +				list_del_init(&inode->i_list);
> +				inode_lru_list_add(inode);
> +			}
>   			spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
>   			return;
>   		}
> @@ -1252,13 +1271,19 @@ static void iput_final(struct inode *inode)
>   		spin_lock(&inode_lock);
>   		WARN_ON(inode->i_state&  I_NEW);
>   		inode->i_state&= ~I_WILL_FREE;
> -		percpu_counter_dec(&nr_inodes_unused);
>   		hlist_del_init(&inode->i_hash);
>   	}
> -	list_del_init(&inode->i_list);
> -	list_del_init(&inode->i_sb_list);
>   	WARN_ON(inode->i_state&  I_NEW);
>   	inode->i_state |= I_FREEING;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * After we delete the inode from the LRU here, we avoid moving dirty
> +	 * inodes back onto the LRU now because I_FREEING is set and hence
> +	 * writeback_single_inode() won't move the inode around.
> +	 */
> +	inode_lru_list_del(inode);
> +
> +	list_del_init(&inode->i_sb_list);
>   	spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
>   	evict(inode);
>   	spin_lock(&inode_lock);
> diff --git a/fs/internal.h b/fs/internal.h
> index a6910e9..ece3565 100644
> --- a/fs/internal.h
> +++ b/fs/internal.h
> @@ -101,3 +101,9 @@ extern void put_super(struct super_block *sb);
>   struct nameidata;
>   extern struct file *nameidata_to_filp(struct nameidata *);
>   extern void release_open_intent(struct nameidata *);
> +
> +/*
> + * inode.c
> + */
> +extern void inode_lru_list_add(struct inode *inode);
> +extern void inode_lru_list_del(struct inode *inode);
> diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
> index 1fb92f9..af1d516 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> @@ -1632,16 +1632,17 @@ struct super_operations {
>    *
>    * Q: What is the difference between I_WILL_FREE and I_FREEING?
>    */
> -#define I_DIRTY_SYNC		1
> -#define I_DIRTY_DATASYNC	2
> -#define I_DIRTY_PAGES		4
> +#define I_DIRTY_SYNC		0x01
> +#define I_DIRTY_DATASYNC	0x02
> +#define I_DIRTY_PAGES		0x04
>   #define __I_NEW			3
>   #define I_NEW			(1<<  __I_NEW)
> -#define I_WILL_FREE		16
> -#define I_FREEING		32
> -#define I_CLEAR			64
> +#define I_WILL_FREE		0x10
> +#define I_FREEING		0x20
> +#define I_CLEAR			0x40
>   #define __I_SYNC		7
>   #define I_SYNC			(1<<  __I_SYNC)
> +#define I_REFERENCED		0x100
>
>   #define I_DIRTY (I_DIRTY_SYNC | I_DIRTY_DATASYNC | I_DIRTY_PAGES)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/writeback.h b/include/linux/writeback.h
> index 72a5d64..f956b66 100644
> --- a/include/linux/writeback.h
> +++ b/include/linux/writeback.h
> @@ -10,7 +10,6 @@
>   struct backing_dev_info;
>
>   extern spinlock_t inode_lock;
> -extern struct list_head inode_in_use;
>   extern struct list_head inode_unused;
>
>   /*
[...]


  reply	other threads:[~2010-10-18 23:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-18  6:20 Inode Lock Scalability V5 Dave Chinner
2010-10-18  6:20 ` [PATCH 01/20] fs: switch bdev inode bdi's correctly Dave Chinner
2010-10-18 23:52   ` Christian Stroetmann
2010-10-18  6:20 ` [PATCH 02/20] kernel: add bl_list Dave Chinner
2010-10-18  6:20 ` [PATCH 03/20] fs: Convert nr_inodes and nr_unused to per-cpu counters Dave Chinner
2010-10-18  6:20 ` [PATCH 04/20] fs: Implement lazy LRU updates for inodes Dave Chinner
2010-10-18 23:52   ` Christian Stroetmann [this message]
2010-10-18  6:20 ` [PATCH 05/20] fs: inode split IO and LRU lists Dave Chinner
2010-10-18  6:20 ` [PATCH 06/20] fs: Clean up inode reference counting Dave Chinner
2010-10-18 23:53   ` Christian Stroetmann
2010-10-19 19:38   ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-18  6:20 ` [PATCH 07/20] exofs: use iput() for inode reference count decrements Dave Chinner
2010-10-18  6:20 ` [PATCH 08/20] fs: rework icount to be a locked variable Dave Chinner
2010-10-18  6:20 ` [PATCH 09/20] fs: Factor inode hash operations into functions Dave Chinner
2010-10-18  6:20 ` [PATCH 10/20] fs: Stop abusing find_inode_fast in iunique Dave Chinner
2010-10-18  6:20 ` [PATCH 11/20] fs: move i_ref increments into find_inode/find_inode_fast Dave Chinner
2010-10-18  6:20 ` [PATCH 12/20] fs: remove inode_add_to_list/__inode_add_to_list Dave Chinner
2010-10-18  6:20 ` [PATCH 13/20] fs: Introduce per-bucket inode hash locks Dave Chinner
2010-10-18  6:20 ` [PATCH 14/20] fs: add a per-superblock lock for the inode list Dave Chinner
2010-10-18  6:20 ` [PATCH 15/20] fs: split locking of inode writeback and LRU lists Dave Chinner
2010-10-18 23:53   ` Christian Stroetmann
2010-10-18  6:20 ` [PATCH 16/20] fs: Protect inode->i_state with the inode->i_lock Dave Chinner
2010-10-18  6:20 ` [PATCH 17/20] fs: introduce a per-cpu last_ino allocator Dave Chinner
2010-10-18  6:20 ` [PATCH 18/20] fs: icache remove inode_lock Dave Chinner
2010-10-18 23:54   ` Christian Stroetmann
2010-10-18  6:20 ` [PATCH 19/20] fs: Reduce inode I_FREEING and factor inode disposal Dave Chinner
2010-10-18  6:20 ` [PATCH 20/20] fs: do not assign default i_ino in new_inode Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4CBCDDD4.3000002@ontolinux.com \
    --to=stroetmann@ontolinux.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).