From: Christian Stroetmann <stroetmann@ontolinux.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: kill get_new_inode{,_fast}
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2010 02:07:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CC378B6.7020207@ontolinux.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101023174440.GA2805@lst.de>
Hola;
Maybe typos
On 23.10.2010 19:44, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> There's very little point in these helpers. One caller each
> doing a tailcall with trivial amounts of code before it.
>
> Merging into callers also makes use of the old vs inode variables
> more obvious.
>
> Also fix up kerneldoc comments to focus on what we are doing and
> not how it's done.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig<hch@lst.de>
>
> Index: linux-2.6/fs/inode.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/fs/inode.c 2010-10-23 19:05:01.114003338 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6/fs/inode.c 2010-10-23 19:40:28.740005644 +0200
> @@ -819,102 +819,6 @@ void unlock_new_inode(struct inode *inod
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(unlock_new_inode);
>
> /*
> - * This is called without the inode lock held.. Be careful.
> - *
> - * We no longer cache the sb_flags in i_flags - see fs.h
> - * -- rmk@arm.uk.linux.org
> - */
> -static struct inode *get_new_inode(struct super_block *sb,
> - struct hlist_head *head,
> - int (*test)(struct inode *, void *),
> - int (*set)(struct inode *, void *),
> - void *data)
> -{
> - struct inode *inode;
> -
> - inode = alloc_inode(sb);
> - if (inode) {
> - struct inode *old;
> -
> - spin_lock(&inode_lock);
> - /* We released the lock, so.. */
> - old = find_inode(sb, head, test, data);
> - if (!old) {
> - if (set(inode, data))
> - goto set_failed;
> -
> - hlist_add_head(&inode->i_hash, head);
> - __inode_sb_list_add(inode);
> - inode->i_state = I_NEW;
> - spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
> -
> - /* Return the locked inode with I_NEW set, the
> - * caller is responsible for filling in the contents
> - */
> - return inode;
> - }
> -
> - /*
> - * Uhhuh, somebody else created the same inode under
> - * us. Use the old inode instead of the one we just
> - * allocated.
> - */
> - spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
> - destroy_inode(inode);
> - inode = old;
> - wait_on_inode(inode);
> - }
> - return inode;
> -
> -set_failed:
> - spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
> - destroy_inode(inode);
> - return NULL;
> -}
> -
> -/*
> - * get_new_inode_fast is the fast path version of get_new_inode, see the
> - * comment at iget_locked for details.
> - */
> -static struct inode *get_new_inode_fast(struct super_block *sb,
> - struct hlist_head *head, unsigned long ino)
> -{
> - struct inode *inode;
> -
> - inode = alloc_inode(sb);
> - if (inode) {
> - struct inode *old;
> -
> - spin_lock(&inode_lock);
> - /* We released the lock, so.. */
> - old = find_inode_fast(sb, head, ino);
> - if (!old) {
> - inode->i_ino = ino;
> - hlist_add_head(&inode->i_hash, head);
> - __inode_sb_list_add(inode);
> - inode->i_state = I_NEW;
> - spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
> -
> - /* Return the locked inode with I_NEW set, the
> - * caller is responsible for filling in the contents
> - */
> - return inode;
> - }
> -
> - /*
> - * Uhhuh, somebody else created the same inode under
> - * us. Use the old inode instead of the one we just
> - * allocated.
> - */
> - spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
> - destroy_inode(inode);
> - inode = old;
> - wait_on_inode(inode);
> - }
> - return inode;
> -}
> -
> -/*
> * search the inode cache for a matching inode number.
> * If we find one, then the inode number we are trying to
> * allocate is not unique and so we should not use it.
> @@ -1147,15 +1051,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(ilookup);
> * @set: callback used to initialize a new struct inode
> * @data: opaque data pointer to pass to @test and @set
> *
> - * iget5_locked() uses ifind() to search for the inode specified by @hashval
> - * and @data in the inode cache and if present it is returned with an increased
> - * reference count. This is a generalized version of iget_locked() for file
> - * systems where the inode number is not sufficient for unique identification
> - * of an inode.
> + * Search for the inode specified by @hashval and @data in the inode cache,
> + * and if present return it with an increased reference count. If the inode
> + * is not in cache, allocate a new inode and returned it hashed and with the
> + * I_NEW flag set. The file system gets to fill the inode in before unlocking
> + * it via unlock_new_inode().
Maybe:
+ * Search for the inode specified by @hashval and @data in the inode cache,
+ * and if present, then return it with an increased reference count. If the inode
+ * is not in cache, then allocate a new inode, and return it hashed and with the
> *
> - * If the inode is not in cache, get_new_inode() is called to allocate a new
> - * inode and this is returned locked, hashed, and with the I_NEW flag set. The
> - * file system gets to fill it in before unlocking it via unlock_new_inode().
> + * This is a generalized version of iget_locked() for file systems where the
> + * inode number is not sufficient for unique identification of an inode.
> *
> * Note both @test and @set are called with the inode_lock held, so can't sleep.
> */
> @@ -1164,16 +1067,48 @@ struct inode *iget5_locked(struct super_
> int (*set)(struct inode *, void *), void *data)
> {
> struct hlist_head *head = inode_hashtable + hash(sb, hashval);
> - struct inode *inode;
> + struct inode *inode, *old;
> +
> + old = ifind(sb, head, test, data, 1);
> + if (old)
> + return old;
> +
> + inode = alloc_inode(sb);
> + if (!inode)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + spin_lock(&inode_lock);
> + /* We released the lock, so.. */
> + old = find_inode(sb, head, test, data);
> + if (old) {
> + /*
> + * Uhhuh, somebody else created the same inode under
Uhhuh is indeed funny, but ...
> + * us. Use the old inode instead of the one we just
> + * allocated.
> + */
> + spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
> + destroy_inode(inode);
> + wait_on_inode(old);
> + return old;
> + }
> +
> + if (set(inode, data))
> + goto set_failed;
> +
> + hlist_add_head(&inode->i_hash, head);
> + __inode_sb_list_add(inode);
> + inode->i_state = I_NEW;
> + spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
>
> - inode = ifind(sb, head, test, data, 1);
> - if (inode)
> - return inode;
> /*
> - * get_new_inode() will do the right thing, re-trying the search
> - * in case it had to block at any point.
> + * Return the locked inode with I_NEW set, the caller is responsible for
> + * filling in the contents
missing end point?!
> */
> - return get_new_inode(sb, head, test, set, data);
> + return inode;
> +set_failed:
> + spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
> + destroy_inode(inode);
> + return NULL;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(iget5_locked);
>
> @@ -1182,29 +1117,51 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(iget5_locked);
> * @sb: super block of file system
> * @ino: inode number to get
> *
> - * iget_locked() uses ifind_fast() to search for the inode specified by @ino in
> - * the inode cache and if present it is returned with an increased reference
> - * count. This is for file systems where the inode number is sufficient for
> - * unique identification of an inode.
> - *
> - * If the inode is not in cache, get_new_inode_fast() is called to allocate a
> - * new inode and this is returned locked, hashed, and with the I_NEW flag set.
> - * The file system gets to fill it in before unlocking it via
> + * Search for the inode specified by @ino in the inode cache, and if present
> + * return it with an increased reference count. If the inode is not in cache,
> + * allocate a new inode and returned it hashed and with the I_NEW flag set.
maybe as above:
+ * Search for the inode specified by @ino in the inode cache, and if present,
+ * then return it with an increased reference count. If the inode is not in cache,
+ * then allocate a new inode, and return it hashed and with the I_NEW flag set.
> + * The file system gets to fill the inode in before unlocking it via
> * unlock_new_inode().
> */
> struct inode *iget_locked(struct super_block *sb, unsigned long ino)
> {
> struct hlist_head *head = inode_hashtable + hash(sb, ino);
> - struct inode *inode;
> + struct inode *inode, *old;
> +
> + old = ifind_fast(sb, head, ino);
> + if (old)
> + return old;
> +
> + inode = alloc_inode(sb);
> + if (!inode)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + spin_lock(&inode_lock);
> + /* We released the lock, so.. */
> + old = find_inode_fast(sb, head, ino);
> + if (old) {
> + /*
> + * Uhhuh, somebody else created the same inode under
Ohhoh, Uhhuh :-D
> + * us. Use the old inode instead of the one we just
> + * allocated.
> + */
> + spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
> + destroy_inode(inode);
> + wait_on_inode(old);
> + return old;
> + }
> +
> + inode->i_ino = ino;
> + hlist_add_head(&inode->i_hash, head);
> + __inode_sb_list_add(inode);
> + inode->i_state = I_NEW;
> + spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
>
> - inode = ifind_fast(sb, head, ino);
> - if (inode)
> - return inode;
> /*
> - * get_new_inode_fast() will do the right thing, re-trying the search
> - * in case it had to block at any point.
> + * Return the locked inode with I_NEW set, the caller is responsible for
> + * filling in the contents
again missing end point?!
> */
> - return get_new_inode_fast(sb, head, ino);
> + return inode;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(iget_locked);
>
> Index: linux-2.6/fs/ocfs2/inode.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/fs/ocfs2/inode.c 2010-10-23 19:10:36.043010811 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6/fs/ocfs2/inode.c 2010-10-23 19:10:48.961026523 +0200
> @@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ bail:
> * here's how inodes get read from disk:
> * iget5_locked -> find_actor -> OCFS2_FIND_ACTOR
> * found? : return the in-memory inode
> - * not found? : get_new_inode -> OCFS2_INIT_LOCKED_INODE
> + * not found? : iget5_locked -> OCFS2_INIT_LOCKED_INODE
> */
>
> static int ocfs2_find_actor(struct inode *inode, void *opaque)
> Index: linux-2.6/fs/udf/inode.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/fs/udf/inode.c 2010-10-23 19:10:52.729253443 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6/fs/udf/inode.c 2010-10-23 19:11:12.188005500 +0200
> @@ -1065,9 +1065,9 @@ static void __udf_read_inode(struct inod
>
> /*
> * Set defaults, but the inode is still incomplete!
> - * Note: get_new_inode() sets the following on a new inode:
> + * Note: iget_locked() sets the following on a new inode:
> * i_sb = sb
> - * i_no = ino
> + * i_ino = ino
> * i_flags = sb->s_flags
> * i_state = 0
> * clean_inode(): zero fills and sets
Have fun
Christian Stroetmann
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-24 0:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-23 17:44 [PATCH] fs: kill get_new_inode{,_fast} Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-24 0:07 ` Christian Stroetmann [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CC378B6.7020207@ontolinux.com \
--to=stroetmann@ontolinux.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).