From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christian Stroetmann <stroetmann@ontolinux.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] fs: remove inode_lock from iput_final and prune_icache
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:11:44 +0200
Message-ID: <4CC7D0B0.3000303@ontolinux.com>
References: <1288153384-8878-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>	 <1288153384-8878-5-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>	 <20101027044038.GE19804@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>	 <1288154866.2652.84.camel@edumazet-laptop>	 <20101027052520.GF19804@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <1288158623.2652.161.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
	format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <1288158623.2652.161.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

  On the 27.10.2010 07:50, Eric Dumazet wrote :
> Le mercredi 27 octobre 2010 =C3=A0 06:25 +0100, Al Viro a =C3=A9crit =
:
>> "i\xe1\xb9\x89ode_lock", i.e. 'n' turned into U+1E49, aka "latin sma=
ll letter
>> n with line below".  I doubt that it's MTA braindamage.
>>
>> In the first patch there's
>>
>> - * invalidate_inodes    - attempt to free all inodes on a
>> + * nvalidate_inodes    - attempt to free all inodes on a
>>
>> and I _really_ doubt that anything in mail system is capable of some=
thing
>> that elaborate.
> Again, I can not see it in my copy, I checked lkml archives too :
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/10/27/7
>
> Mail was fine, maybe your file system is corrupted ?
>
I have it in patch 4/4 too.
But in patch 1/4 could it be just a typo?

Christian Stroetmann