From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] fix up lock order reversal in writeback
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 22:30:37 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CE35A6D.2040906@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101116130146.GG4757@quack.suse.cz>
On 11/16/10 7:01 AM, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Tue 16-11-10 22:00:58, Nick Piggin wrote:
>> I saw a lock order warning on ext4 trigger. This should solve it.
>> Raciness shouldn't matter much, because writeback can stop just
>> after we make the test and return anyway (so the API is racy anyway).
> Hmm, for now the fix is OK. Ultimately, we probably want to call
> writeback_inodes_sb() directly from all the callers. They all just want to
> reduce uncertainty of delayed allocation reservations by writing delayed
> data and actually wait for some of the writeback to happen before they
> retry again the allocation.
For ext4, at least, it's just best-effort. We're not actually out of
space yet when this starts pushing. But it helps us avoid enospc:
commit c8afb44682fcef6273e8b8eb19fab13ddd05b386
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Date: Wed Dec 23 07:58:12 2009 -0500
ext4: flush delalloc blocks when space is low
Creating many small files in rapid succession on a small
filesystem can lead to spurious ENOSPC; on a 104MB filesystem:
for i in `seq 1 22500`; do
echo -n > $SCRATCH_MNT/$i
echo XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX > $SCRATCH_MNT/$i
done
leads to ENOSPC even though after a sync, 40% of the fs is free
again.
<snip>
We don't need it to be synchronous - in fact I didn't think it was ...
ext4 should probably use btrfs's new variant and just get rid of the
one I put in, for a very large system/filesystem it could end up doing
a rather insane amount of IO when the fs starts to get full.
as for the locking problems ... sorry about that!
-Eric
> Although the callers generally cannot get umount_sem because they hold
> other locks, they have the superblock well pinned so grabbing umount_sem
> makes sense mostly to make assertions happy. But as I'm thinking about it,
> trylock *is* maybe the right answer to this anyway...
>
> So
> Acked-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
>
> Honza
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
>>
>> Index: linux-2.6/fs/fs-writeback.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- linux-2.6.orig/fs/fs-writeback.c 2010-11-16 21:44:32.000000000 +1100
>> +++ linux-2.6/fs/fs-writeback.c 2010-11-16 21:49:37.000000000 +1100
>> @@ -1125,16 +1125,20 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(writeback_inodes_sb);
>> *
>> * Invoke writeback_inodes_sb if no writeback is currently underway.
>> * Returns 1 if writeback was started, 0 if not.
>> + *
>> + * May be called inside i_lock. May not start writeback if locks cannot
>> + * be acquired.
>> */
>> int writeback_inodes_sb_if_idle(struct super_block *sb)
>> {
>> if (!writeback_in_progress(sb->s_bdi)) {
>> - down_read(&sb->s_umount);
>> - writeback_inodes_sb(sb);
>> - up_read(&sb->s_umount);
>> - return 1;
>> - } else
>> - return 0;
>> + if (down_read_trylock(&sb->s_umount)) {
>> + writeback_inodes_sb(sb);
>> + up_read(&sb->s_umount);
>> + return 1;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + return 0;
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(writeback_inodes_sb_if_idle);
>>
>> @@ -1145,17 +1149,21 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(writeback_inodes_sb_if_idl
>> *
>> * Invoke writeback_inodes_sb if no writeback is currently underway.
>> * Returns 1 if writeback was started, 0 if not.
>> + *
>> + * May be called inside i_lock. May not start writeback if locks cannot
>> + * be acquired.
>> */
>> int writeback_inodes_sb_nr_if_idle(struct super_block *sb,
>> unsigned long nr)
>> {
>> if (!writeback_in_progress(sb->s_bdi)) {
>> - down_read(&sb->s_umount);
>> - writeback_inodes_sb_nr(sb, nr);
>> - up_read(&sb->s_umount);
>> - return 1;
>> - } else
>> - return 0;
>> + if (down_read_trylock(&sb->s_umount)) {
>> + writeback_inodes_sb_nr(sb, nr);
>> + up_read(&sb->s_umount);
>> + return 1;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + return 0;
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(writeback_inodes_sb_nr_if_idle);
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-17 4:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-16 11:00 [patch] fix up lock order reversal in writeback Nick Piggin
2010-11-16 13:01 ` Jan Kara
2010-11-17 4:30 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2010-11-17 4:38 ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-17 5:05 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-11-17 6:10 ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-18 3:06 ` Ted Ts'o
2010-11-18 3:29 ` Andrew Morton
2010-11-18 6:00 ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-18 6:28 ` Andrew Morton
2010-11-18 8:18 ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-18 10:51 ` Theodore Tso
2010-11-18 17:58 ` Andrew Morton
2010-11-19 5:10 ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-19 12:07 ` Theodore Tso
2010-11-18 14:55 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-11-18 17:10 ` Andrew Morton
2010-11-18 18:04 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-11-18 18:24 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-11-18 18:39 ` Chris Mason
2010-11-18 18:36 ` Andrew Morton
2010-11-18 18:51 ` Chris Mason
2010-11-18 20:22 ` Andrew Morton
2010-11-18 20:36 ` Chris Mason
2010-11-18 19:02 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-11-18 20:17 ` Andrew Morton
2010-11-18 18:33 ` Chris Mason
2010-11-18 23:58 ` Jan Kara
2010-11-19 0:45 ` Jan Kara
2010-11-19 5:16 ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-22 18:16 ` Jan Kara
2010-11-23 8:07 ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-23 13:32 ` Jan Kara
2010-11-23 8:15 ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-18 18:53 ` Al Viro
2010-11-18 3:18 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-11-22 23:43 ` Andrew Morton
2010-11-16 20:32 ` Andrew Morton
2010-11-17 3:56 ` Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CE35A6D.2040906@redhat.com \
--to=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@kernel.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).