From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kent Overstreet Subject: Re: Bcache version 9 Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 03:21:33 -0800 Message-ID: <4D09F63D.8040406@gmail.com> References: <20101121140808.GA6429@moria> <20101122010914.GB7688@kroah.com> <4CEB7648.8030000@gmail.com> <20101201041610.GA5891@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20101201041610.GA5891@kroah.com> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On 11/30/2010 08:16 PM, Greg KH wrote: > True, but I thought configfs could handle "bare" config items, you might > want to look a bit closer as to how people are using it. But I could be > totally wrong however. Just in case I wasn't the only one confused, I stared at the documentation and examples some more... still wasn't completely sure, so I wrote the code, and bare attributes without a configfs item do work. I just switched to configfs for the stuff that was in /sys/kernel/bcache, it'll be in the next version. Almost got everything done on my todo list before it's ready to be submitted...