linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Milan Broz <mbroz@redhat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: "Jun'ichi Nomura" <j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
	device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
	Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>,
	Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH UPDATED] block: restore multiple bd_link_disk_holder() support
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 22:09:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D30BB78.5020101@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110114161043.GB978@htj.dyndns.org>

On 01/14/2011 05:10 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Commit e09b457b (block: simplify holder symlink handling) incorrectly
> assumed that there is only one link at maximum.  dm may use multiple
> links and expects block layer to track reference count for each link,
> which is different from and unrelated to the exclusive device holder
> identified by @holder when the device is opened.
> 
> Remove the single holder assumption and automatic removal of the link
> and revive the per-link reference count tracking.  The code
> essentially behaves the same as before commit e09b457b sans the
> unnecessary kobject reference count dancing.
> 
> While at it, note that this facility should not be used by anyone else
> than the current ones.  Sysfs symlinks shouldn't be abused like this
> and the whole thing doesn't belong in the block layer at all.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Reported-by: Milan Broz <mbroz@redhat.com>
> Cc: Jun'ichi Nomura <j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com>
> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
> Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>
> ---
> Thanks for the test commands.  They were very helpful.  Can you please
> test this one?

Hi,

yes, this one works for me. I run full lvm2 testsuite and no warnings.
Thanks!

Tested-by: Milan Broz <mbroz@redhat.com>

Milan

  reply	other threads:[~2011-01-14 21:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-12 17:34 linux-next - WARNING: at fs/block_dev.c:824 bd_link_disk_holder+0x92/0x1ac() Valdis.Kletnieks
2011-01-13  0:23 ` Milan Broz
2011-01-13  2:19   ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2011-01-13 11:06     ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-13 11:26       ` [dm-devel] " Milan Broz
2011-01-13 12:27         ` Karel Zak
2011-01-13 13:12           ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-13 13:26             ` Karel Zak
2011-01-13 13:37               ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-13 13:52                 ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-13 13:58                 ` Milan Broz
2011-01-13 14:11                   ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-13 14:25                     ` Milan Broz
2011-01-13 14:30                       ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-13 14:43                         ` Kay Sievers
2011-01-13 15:03                           ` Milan Broz
2011-01-14  7:38                             ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2011-01-13 15:59                           ` Karel Zak
2011-01-13 16:10                             ` [dm-devel] " Kay Sievers
2011-01-14 15:07                               ` Karel Zak
2011-01-14 15:23                                 ` Kay Sievers
2011-01-13 14:45                         ` Theodore Tso
2011-01-13 20:18                           ` NeilBrown
2011-01-13 20:41                             ` Ted Ts'o
2011-01-14 16:20                               ` Tejun Heo
     [not found]                               ` <20110114162022.GC978@htj.dyndns.org>
2011-01-14 17:59                                 ` Ted Ts'o
2011-01-14 18:23                                   ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-13 14:49                         ` Milan Broz
2011-01-14 16:35                           ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-13 17:21     ` [PATCH] block: restore multiple bd_link_disk_holder() support Tejun Heo
2011-01-13 18:42       ` Milan Broz
2011-01-14  7:31         ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2011-01-14 16:10           ` [PATCH UPDATED] " Tejun Heo
2011-01-14 21:09             ` Milan Broz [this message]
2011-01-17  0:18               ` Jun'ichi Nomura

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D30BB78.5020101@redhat.com \
    --to=mbroz@redhat.com \
    --cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).