From: "Venkateswararao Jujjuri (JV)" <jvrao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [V9fs-developer] :[RFC] [PATCH 6/7] [net/9p] Read and Write side zerocopy changes for 9P2000.L protocol.
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 15:50:40 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D51D6D0.6040200@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimBf+twXBx0_XJEfPUhn40Ep62jCCzjTLL-3nsy@mail.gmail.com>
On 2/8/2011 1:09 PM, Eric Van Hensbergen wrote:
> One thing I wonder is if we always want to zero copy for payload. In
> the extreme, do we want to take the overhead of pinning an extra page
> if we are only reading/writing a byte? memcpy is expensive for large
> packets, but may actually be more efficient for small packets.
I am not a memory expert, but I would assume memcpy also need to do
same thing similar to get_user_pages() short of pinning pages. But I see the point.
>
> Have we done any performance measurements of this code with various
> payload sizes versus non-zero-copy? Of course that may not really
> show the impact of pinning the extra pages....
All our testing is with large buffers. Did not test with small buffers.
>
> In any case, if such a tradeoff did exist, we might choose to not do
> zero copy for requests smaller than some size -- and that might
> alleviate some of the problems with the legacy protocols (such as the
> Rerror issue) -- killing two birds with one stone. In any case, given
I think it is a wise decision to avoid zero copy if iosize+hdr_size <= pagesize.
But It doesn't change any of today's complexity. Except may be saving an if
condition.
> the implementations it should be really easy to shut me up with
> comparison data of zc and non-zc for 1, 64, 128, 256, 512, 1024, 2048,
> 4192 byte payloads (without caches enabled of course).
I think this is good experiment will publish data.
>
> -eric
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 12:57 AM, Venkateswararao Jujjuri (JV)
> <jvrao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>> On 2/6/2011 11:21 PM, Venkateswararao Jujjuri (JV) wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Venkateswararao Jujjuri <jvrao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>> ---
>>> net/9p/client.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>>> net/9p/protocol.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 2 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/net/9p/client.c b/net/9p/client.c
>>> index a848bca..f939edf 100644
>>> --- a/net/9p/client.c
>>> +++ b/net/9p/client.c
>>> @@ -1270,7 +1270,14 @@ p9_client_read(struct p9_fid *fid, char *data, char __user *udata, u64 offset,
>>> if (count < rsize)
>>> rsize = count;
>>>
>>> - req = p9_client_rpc(clnt, P9_TREAD, "dqd", fid->fid, offset, rsize);
>>> + if ((clnt->trans_mod->pref & P9_TRANS_PREF_PAYLOAD_MASK) ==
>>> + P9_TRANS_PREF_PAYLOAD_SEP) {
>>> + req = p9_client_rpc(clnt, P9_TREAD, "dqE", fid->fid, offset,
>>> + rsize, data ? data : udata);
>>> + } else {
>>> + req = p9_client_rpc(clnt, P9_TREAD, "dqd", fid->fid, offset,
>>> + rsize);
>>> + }
>>> if (IS_ERR(req)) {
>>> err = PTR_ERR(req);
>>> goto error;
>>> @@ -1284,13 +1291,15 @@ p9_client_read(struct p9_fid *fid, char *data, char __user *udata, u64 offset,
>>>
>>> P9_DPRINTK(P9_DEBUG_9P, "<<< RREAD count %d\n", count);
>>>
>>> - if (data) {
>>> - memmove(data, dataptr, count);
>>> - } else {
>>> - err = copy_to_user(udata, dataptr, count);
>>> - if (err) {
>>> - err = -EFAULT;
>>> - goto free_and_error;
>>> + if (!req->tc->pbuf_size) {
>>> + if (data) {
>>> + memmove(data, dataptr, count);
>>> + } else {
>>> + err = copy_to_user(udata, dataptr, count);
>>> + if (err) {
>>> + err = -EFAULT;
>>> + goto free_and_error;
>>> + }
>>> }
>>> }
>>> p9_free_req(clnt, req);
>>> @@ -1323,12 +1332,20 @@ p9_client_write(struct p9_fid *fid, char *data, const char __user *udata,
>>>
>>> if (count < rsize)
>>> rsize = count;
>>> - if (data)
>>> - req = p9_client_rpc(clnt, P9_TWRITE, "dqD", fid->fid, offset,
>>> - rsize, data);
>>> - else
>>> - req = p9_client_rpc(clnt, P9_TWRITE, "dqU", fid->fid, offset,
>>> - rsize, udata);
>>> +
>>> + if ((clnt->trans_mod->pref & P9_TRANS_PREF_PAYLOAD_MASK) ==
>>> + P9_TRANS_PREF_PAYLOAD_SEP) {
>>> + req = p9_client_rpc(clnt, P9_TWRITE, "dqF", fid->fid, offset,
>>> + rsize, data ? data : udata);
>>> + } else {
>>> + if (data)
>>> + req = p9_client_rpc(clnt, P9_TWRITE, "dqD", fid->fid,
>>> + offset, rsize, data);
>>> + else
>>> + req = p9_client_rpc(clnt, P9_TWRITE, "dqU", fid->fid,
>>> + offset, rsize, udata);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> if (IS_ERR(req)) {
>>> err = PTR_ERR(req);
>>> goto error;
>>> diff --git a/net/9p/protocol.c b/net/9p/protocol.c
>>> index dfc358f..ea778dd 100644
>>> --- a/net/9p/protocol.c
>>> +++ b/net/9p/protocol.c
>>> @@ -114,6 +114,24 @@ pdu_write_u(struct p9_fcall *pdu, const char __user *udata, size_t size)
>>> return size - len;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static size_t
>>> +pdu_write_uw(struct p9_fcall *pdu, const char *udata, size_t size)
>>> +{
>>> + size_t len = min(pdu->capacity - pdu->size, size);
>>> + pdu->pbuf = udata;
>>> + pdu->pbuf_size = len;
>>> + return size - len;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static size_t
>>> +pdu_write_ur(struct p9_fcall *pdu, const char *udata, size_t size)
>>> +{
>>> + size_t len = min(pdu->capacity - pdu->size, size);
>>> + pdu->pbuf = udata;
>>> + pdu->pbuf_size = len;
>>> + return size - len;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> /*
>>> b - int8_t
>>> w - int16_t
>>> @@ -445,6 +463,26 @@ p9pdu_vwritef(struct p9_fcall *pdu, int proto_version, const char *fmt,
>>> errcode = -EFAULT;
>>> }
>>> break;
>>> + case 'E':{
>>> + int32_t count = va_arg(ap, int32_t);
>>> + const char *udata = va_arg(ap, const void *);
>>> + errcode = p9pdu_writef(pdu, proto_version, "d",
>>> + count);
>>> + if (!errcode && pdu_write_ur(pdu, udata,
>>> + count))
>>> + errcode = -EFAULT;
>>> + }
>>> + break;
>>> + case 'F':{
>>> + int32_t count = va_arg(ap, int32_t);
>>> + const char *udata = va_arg(ap, const void *);
>>> + errcode = p9pdu_writef(pdu, proto_version, "d",
>>> + count);
>>> + if (!errcode && pdu_write_uw(pdu, udata,
>>> + count))
>>> + errcode = -EFAULT;
>>> + }
>>> + break;
>>> case 'U':{
>>> int32_t count = va_arg(ap, int32_t);
>>> const char __user *udata =
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> The modern datacenter depends on network connectivity to access resources
>> and provide services. The best practices for maximizing a physical server's
>> connectivity to a physical network are well understood - see how these
>> rules translate into the virtual world?
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnlfb
>> _______________________________________________
>> V9fs-developer mailing list
>> V9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/v9fs-developer
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-08 23:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-07 7:21 [RFC-V2] [PATCH 0/7] Zero Copy Venkateswararao Jujjuri (JV)
2011-02-07 6:55 ` Venkateswararao Jujjuri (JV)
2011-02-07 7:21 ` [RFC] [PATCH 1/7] [net/9p] Additional elements to p9_fcall to accomodate zero copy Venkateswararao Jujjuri (JV)
2011-02-07 7:21 ` Venkateswararao Jujjuri (JV)
2011-02-07 6:56 ` [RFC] [PATCH 2/7] [net/9p] Adds supporting functions for " Venkateswararao Jujjuri (JV)
2011-02-08 15:20 ` [V9fs-developer] " Latchesar Ionkov
2011-02-08 17:21 ` Venkateswararao Jujjuri (JV)
2011-02-07 7:21 ` [RFC] [PATCH 1/7] [net/9p] Additional elements to p9_fcall to accomodate " Venkateswararao Jujjuri (JV)
2011-02-07 6:56 ` [RFC] [PATCH 3/7] [net/9p] Assign type of transaction to tc->pdu->id which is otherwise unsed Venkateswararao Jujjuri (JV)
2011-02-07 7:21 ` [RFC] [PATCH 1/7] [net/9p] Additional elements to p9_fcall to accomodate zero copy Venkateswararao Jujjuri (JV)
2011-02-07 6:56 ` [RFC] [PATCH 4/7] [net/9p] Add gup/zero_copy support to VirtIO transport layer Venkateswararao Jujjuri (JV)
2011-02-07 7:21 ` [RFC] [PATCH 1/7] [net/9p] Additional elements to p9_fcall to accomodate zero copy Venkateswararao Jujjuri (JV)
2011-02-07 6:57 ` [RFC] [PATCH 5/7] [net/9p] Add preferences to transport layer Venkateswararao Jujjuri (JV)
2011-02-07 7:21 ` [RFC] [PATCH 1/7] [net/9p] Additional elements to p9_fcall to accomodate zero copy Venkateswararao Jujjuri (JV)
2011-02-07 6:57 ` :[RFC] [PATCH 6/7] [net/9p] Read and Write side zerocopy changes for 9P2000.L protocol Venkateswararao Jujjuri (JV)
2011-02-08 21:09 ` [V9fs-developer] " Eric Van Hensbergen
2011-02-08 21:16 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2011-02-09 21:09 ` Venkateswararao Jujjuri (JV)
2011-02-09 21:12 ` Venkateswararao Jujjuri (JV)
2011-02-09 21:18 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2011-02-09 21:39 ` Venkateswararao Jujjuri (JV)
2011-02-08 23:50 ` Venkateswararao Jujjuri (JV) [this message]
2011-02-09 1:59 ` Venkateswararao Jujjuri (JV)
2011-02-09 14:28 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2011-02-07 7:21 ` [RFC] [PATCH 1/7] [net/9p] Additional elements to p9_fcall to accomodate zero copy Venkateswararao Jujjuri (JV)
2011-02-07 6:58 ` [PATCH 7/7] [net/9p] Handle TREAD/RERROR case in !dotl case Venkateswararao Jujjuri (JV)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D51D6D0.6040200@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=jvrao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ericvh@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).