From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tao Ma Subject: Re: XFS status update for January 2011 Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 10:17:26 +0800 Message-ID: <4D5890B6.2090105@tao.ma> References: <20110213184219.GA22792@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Return-path: Received: from cpoproxy2-pub.bluehost.com ([67.222.39.38]:36714 "HELO cpoproxy2-pub.bluehost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751116Ab1BNCRa (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Feb 2011 21:17:30 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20110213184219.GA22792@infradead.org> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Christoph, On 02/14/2011 02:42 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On the 4th of January we saw the release of Linux 2.6.37, which contains a > large XFS update: > > 67 files changed, 1424 insertions(+), 1524 deletions(-) > > User visible changes are the new XFS_IOC_ZERO_RANGE ioctl which allows > to convert already allocated space into unwritten extents that return > zeros on a read, > would you mind describing some scenario that this ioctl can be used. I am just wondering whether ocfs2 can implement it as well. Regards, Tao