From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@kernel.org, Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>,
Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] block: fix mis-synchronisation in blkdev_issue_zeroout()
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 10:29:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D79EB7B.10702@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1299830784-6622-1-git-send-email-lczerner@redhat.com>
On 2011-03-11 09:06, Lukas Czerner wrote:
> BZ29402
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29402
>
> We can hit serious mis-synchronization in bio completion path of
> blkdev_issue_zeroout() leading to a panic.
>
> The problem is that when we are going to wait_for_completion() in
> blkdev_issue_zeroout() we check if the bb.done equals issued (number of
> submitted bios). If it does, we can skip the wait_for_completition()
> and just out of the function since there is nothing to wait for.
> However, there is a ordering problem because bio_batch_end_io() is
> calling atomic_inc(&bb->done) before complete(), hence it might seem to
> blkdev_issue_zeroout() that all bios has been completed and exit. At
> this point when bio_batch_end_io() is going to call complete(bb->wait),
> bb and wait does not longer exist since it was allocated on stack in
> blkdev_issue_zeroout() ==> panic!
>
> (thread 1) (thread 2)
> bio_batch_end_io() blkdev_issue_zeroout()
> if(bb) { ...
> if (bb->end_io) ...
> bb->end_io(bio, err); ...
> atomic_inc(&bb->done); ...
> ... while (issued != atomic_read(&bb.done))
> ... (let issued == bb.done)
> ... (do the rest of the function)
> ... return ret;
> complete(bb->wait);
> ^^^^^^^^
> panic
>
> We can fix this easily by simplifying bio_batch and completion counting.
>
> Also remove bio_end_io_t *end_io since it is not used.
Thanks Lukas, I'll expedite this for 2.6.38!
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-11 9:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-11 8:06 [PATCH v2] block: fix mis-synchronisation in blkdev_issue_zeroout() Lukas Czerner
2011-03-11 9:29 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2011-03-11 14:23 ` Jeff Moyer
2011-03-11 14:31 ` Lukas Czerner
2011-03-11 14:36 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D79EB7B.10702@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dmonakhov@openvz.org \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=lczerner@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).