From: Ryan Mallon <ryan-7Wk5F4Od5/oYd5yxfr4S2w@public.gmane.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew-Ztpu424NOJ8@public.gmane.org>
Cc: viro-RmSDqhL/yNMiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org,
dchinner-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
Trond.Myklebust-HgOvQuBEEgTQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] Add unlocked version of igrab.
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:39:13 +1300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D9010F1.1040909@bluewatersys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110328025423.GN13806-6jwH94ZQLHl74goWV3ctuw@public.gmane.org>
On 03/28/2011 03:54 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 02:56:00PM +1300, Ryan Mallon wrote:
>> Commit 250df6ed274d767da844a5d9f05720b804240197 "fs: protect
>> inode->i_state with inode->i_lock" changes igrab to acquire inode->i_lock,
>> however some callees, notably nfs_inode_add_request, already hold the lock
>> when calling igrab.
>
> I think a better solution to your problem is to notice that this is
> called in the context of doing a write to an inode. That means we
> must already have a reference count on this inode, so it can't possibly
> be in I_FREEING or I_WILL_FREE. That means we can just call __iget()
> instead ... except that __iget isn't exported to modules.
Ah, okay. Thanks for the hint.
A few other locations that I can see that call igrab with inode->i_lock
held are:
fs/ceph/snap.c::ceph_queue_cap_snap
fs/ceph/addr.c::ceph_set_page_dirty
fs/nfs/nfs4state.c::nfs4_get_open_state
There may be some more cases where the locking is less obvious. I don't
know enough about the filesystem code to say whether each of those can
skip the (I_FREEING | I_WILL_FREE) check, or whether the correct
approach is to modify the filesystems themselves so that they do not
hold i_lock when calling igrab (i.e. rework to use a different outer lock)?
If the correct approach is to use __iget or __igrab then I can prepare a
patch for this. In the case of __iget, should it just be marked
EXPORT_SYMBOL and added to include/linux/fs.h?
~Ryan
--
Bluewater Systems Ltd - ARM Technology Solution Centre
Ryan Mallon 5 Amuri Park, 404 Barbadoes St
ryan-7Wk5F4Od5/oYd5yxfr4S2w@public.gmane.org PO Box 13 889, Christchurch 8013
http://www.bluewatersys.com New Zealand
Phone: +64 3 3779127 Freecall: Australia 1800 148 751
Fax: +64 3 3779135 USA 1800 261 2934
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-28 4:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-28 1:55 [RFC PATCH 0/2] Introduce unlocked version of igrab Ryan Mallon
2011-03-28 1:56 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] Add " Ryan Mallon
[not found] ` <1301277361-9453-2-git-send-email-ryan-7Wk5F4Od5/oYd5yxfr4S2w@public.gmane.org>
2011-03-28 2:54 ` Matthew Wilcox
[not found] ` <20110328025423.GN13806-6jwH94ZQLHl74goWV3ctuw@public.gmane.org>
2011-03-28 4:39 ` Ryan Mallon [this message]
[not found] ` <4D9010F1.1040909-7Wk5F4Od5/oYd5yxfr4S2w@public.gmane.org>
2011-03-28 5:19 ` [PATCH] fs: don't use igrab() while holding i_lock (was Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] Add unlocked version of igrab.) Dave Chinner
2011-03-28 1:56 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] Use __igrab instead of igrab in nfs_inode_add_request Ryan Mallon
[not found] ` <1301277361-9453-1-git-send-email-ryan-7Wk5F4Od5/oYd5yxfr4S2w@public.gmane.org>
2011-03-28 4:43 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] Introduce unlocked version of igrab Dave Chinner
2011-03-28 4:47 ` Ryan Mallon
2011-03-28 5:03 ` Ryan Mallon
[not found] ` <4D9016B7.1080505-7Wk5F4Od5/oYd5yxfr4S2w@public.gmane.org>
2011-03-28 6:01 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D9010F1.1040909@bluewatersys.com \
--to=ryan-7wk5f4od5/oyd5yxfr4s2w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust-HgOvQuBEEgTQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dchinner-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=matthew-Ztpu424NOJ8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=viro-RmSDqhL/yNMiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).