From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ric Wheeler Subject: Re: [Lsf] Preliminary Agenda and Activities for LSF Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 16:31:57 -0400 Message-ID: <4D9241BD.6070704@gmail.com> References: <1301373398.2590.20.camel@mulgrave.site> <4D91BF90.8070909@redhat.com> <20110329202904.GG7184@quack.suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Ric Wheeler , James Bottomley , lsf@lists.linux-foundation.org, device-mapper development , linux-fsdevel , "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" To: Jan Kara Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20110329202904.GG7184@quack.suse.cz> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On 03/29/2011 04:29 PM, Jan Kara wrote: > On Tue 29-03-11 07:16:32, Ric Wheeler wrote: >> On 03/29/2011 12:36 AM, James Bottomley wrote: >> (3) The union mount versus overlayfs debate - pros and cons. What each do well, >> what needs doing. Do we want/need both upstream? (Maybe this can get 10 minutes >> in Al's VFS session?) > It might be interesting but neither Miklos nor Val seems to be attending > so I'm not sure how deep discussion we can have :). > > Honza Very true - probably best to keep that discussion focused upstream (but that seems to have quieted down as well)... Ric