From: Tao Ma <tm@tao.ma>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez <clopez@igalia.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
"bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org"
<bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org>,
"daaugusto@gmail.com" <daaugusto@gmail.com>,
"kernel-bugzilla@cygnusx-1.org" <kernel-bugzilla@cygnusx-1.org>,
"listposter@gmail.com" <listposter@gmail.com>,
"justincase@yopmail.com" <justincase@yopmail.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Bug 18632] "INFO: task" dpkg "blocked for more than 120 seconds.
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 21:56:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DF0D120.3010200@tao.ma> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110609124315.GA8789@localhost>
On 06/09/2011 08:43 PM, Wu Fengguang wrote:
>>> It's definitely a problem that cfq delays async writes too much.
>>> However in Carlos's report,
>>>
>>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=61222
>>>
>>> there are no sync(1) or fsync running at all. So it may be indicating
>>> a different problem.
>>
>> If you have a heavy read load we still need to write back timestamps,
>> and it kinda sounds like he's hitting that. No guarantee that actuall
>> is the cause, though.
>
> Right, in the other email I do find the reads.
>
> So Carlos, it's worthwhile to try the deadline scheduler, which will
> at least improve read/write workloads (likely the one you are running)
> that don't involve sync/fsync.
yes, deadline scheduler surely should help in this cases.
Regards,
Tao
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-09 13:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bug-18632-27@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
[not found] ` <201106082138.p58Lchgj002615@demeter2.kernel.org>
[not found] ` <20110608150241.8412a63d.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2011-06-09 3:32 ` [Bug 18632] "INFO: task" dpkg "blocked for more than 120 seconds Wu Fengguang
2011-06-09 3:54 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-06-09 8:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-09 9:09 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-06-09 11:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-09 12:11 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-06-09 12:17 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-06-09 12:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-09 12:43 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-06-09 13:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-10 3:21 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-06-19 15:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-19 16:33 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-06-09 13:56 ` Tao Ma [this message]
2011-06-09 14:12 ` Tao Ma
2011-06-09 14:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-09 14:32 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-06-09 14:51 ` Tao Ma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DF0D120.3010200@tao.ma \
--to=tm@tao.ma \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=clopez@igalia.com \
--cc=daaugusto@gmail.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=justincase@yopmail.com \
--cc=kernel-bugzilla@cygnusx-1.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=listposter@gmail.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).