linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: drepper@akkadia.org
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	rientjes@google.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, wilsons@start.ca,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add cloexec information to fdinfo
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:54:41 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DF57BF1.90509@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201106100355.p5A3t8Aa024924@drepperk.user.openhosting.com>

(2011/06/10 12:55), drepper@akkadia.org wrote:
> There is one piece of information about a file descriptor which is
> currently not visible from the outside: the close-on-exec flag.  The
> /proc/PID/fdinfo/* files have the mode information but this is
> missing.  Is the following patch acceptable?
> 
> What I don't know is whether the RCU locking is needed given that
> real locks are taken.  Someone with more knowledge could just
> remove those two lines.
> 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@gmail.com>
> 
>  base.c |   17 ++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
> index 14def99..bda3651 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/base.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/base.c
> @@ -1924,12 +1924,23 @@ static int proc_fd_info(struct inode *inode, struct path *path, char *info)
>  				*path = file->f_path;
>  				path_get(&file->f_path);
>  			}
> -			if (info)
> +			if (info) {
> +				int cloexec;
> +				struct fdtable *fdt;
> +
> +				rcu_read_lock();
> +				fdt = files_fdtable(files);
> +				cloexec = FD_ISSET(fd, fdt->close_on_exec);
> +				rcu_read_unlock();
> +
>  				snprintf(info, PROC_FDINFO_MAX,
>  					 "pos:\t%lli\n"
> -					 "flags:\t0%o\n",
> +					 "flags:\t0%o\n"
> +					 "cloexec: %d\n",
>  					 (long long) file->f_pos,
> -					 file->f_flags);
> +					 file->f_flags,
> +					 cloexec);
> +			}
>  			spin_unlock(&files->file_lock);
>  			put_files_struct(files);
>  			return 0;

I think this is correct and useful. However I don't know fdtable life cycle detail.
cc to linux-fsdevel.

           reply	other threads:[~2011-06-13  2:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed
 [parent not found: <201106100355.p5A3t8Aa024924@drepperk.user.openhosting.com>]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DF57BF1.90509@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=drepper@akkadia.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=wilsons@start.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).