From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ric Wheeler Subject: Union mount and overlayfs bake off? Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 10:39:06 +0100 Message-ID: <4E0AF2BA.2040706@gmail.com> References: <1302756608.2854.10.camel@perseus.themaw.net> <4DA4B6A8.7030804@gmail.com> <4DA5DCB8.3040101@gmail.com> <4DA5F569.9020309@gmail.com> <24792.1302808448@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Ian Kent , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Moyer , miklos@szeredi.hu, Christoph Hellwig To: David Howells , Michal Suchanek , Alexander Viro Return-path: Received: from mail-vw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.212.46]:62029 "EHLO mail-vw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754098Ab1F2JjK (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jun 2011 05:39:10 -0400 In-Reply-To: <24792.1302808448@redhat.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: I think that it has been a while since David reposted the refreshed patch set for union mounts & know that overlayfs has recent updates as well. Despite that, I have not seen a lot of feedback from reviewers or testers. Al, from your point of view, where we stand? Thanks! Ric