From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jens Axboe Subject: Re: Please pull NFS client changes Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2011 22:03:28 +0200 Message-ID: <4E35B510.5060109@fusionio.com> References: <1312082377.10882.1.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <20110731182406.GA16470@infradead.org> <4E35A9B1.9090309@fusionio.com> <1312141193.7127.1.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <4E35B126.8050009@fusionio.com> <1312142325.7127.3.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Linus Torvalds , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" To: Trond Myklebust Return-path: Received: from mx2.fusionio.com ([66.114.96.31]:45566 "EHLO mx2.fusionio.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751894Ab1GaUDi (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Jul 2011 16:03:38 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1312142325.7127.3.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 2011-07-31 21:58, Trond Myklebust wrote: > On Sun, 2011-07-31 at 21:46 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:=20 >> On 2011-07-31 21:39, Trond Myklebust wrote: >>> On Sun, 2011-07-31 at 21:14 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:=20 >>>> On 2011-07-31 20:24, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>>>> How does this manage to include the pnfs block code, which only w= as posted >>>>> on the list a few hours before the pull request, and which doesn'= t >>>>> appear to past testing very well (although the major issue seems = to be >>>>> core nfs code)? >>>> >>>> And it doesn't even compile: >>>> >>>> In file included from fs/nfs/client.c:51:0: >>>> fs/nfs/pnfs.h:384:1: error: expected identifier or =E2=80=98(=E2=80= =99 before =E2=80=98{=E2=80=99 token >>>> fs/nfs/client.c: In function =E2=80=98nfs_server_set_fsinfo=E2=80=99= : >>>> fs/nfs/client.c:939:8: error: =E2=80=98struct nfs_server=E2=80=99 = has no member named >>>> =E2=80=98pnfs_blksize=E2=80=99 >>>> fs/nfs/client.c: At top level: >>>> fs/nfs/pnfs.h:382:20: warning: =E2=80=98set_pnfs_layoutdriver=E2=80= =99 used but never >>>> defined [enabled by default] >>>> make[2]: *** [fs/nfs/client.o] Error 1 >>> >>> Sigh. This should fix it... >> >> Only the first one, there are two independent places it broke. You >> missed this bit: >> >> fs/nfs/client.c:939:8: error: =E2=80=98struct nfs_server=E2=80=99 ha= s no member named >=20 > How's this? Yup, that gets both. --=20 Jens Axboe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel= " in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html