From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/3] A few patches for dcache
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 10:31:51 +0400
Message-ID: <4E549AD7.7000608@parallels.com>
References: <20110728131219.146414619@openvz.org> <20110729032503.GD5404@dastard> <20110729055918.GB15883@sun> <20110729065951.GE5404@dastard> <20110729072441.GA2203@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20110815074229.GL2182@sun>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	LINUXFS-ML <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	James Bottomley <jbottomley@parallels.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mailhub.sw.ru ([195.214.232.25]:18561 "EHLO relay.sw.ru"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752028Ab1HXGcx (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 24 Aug 2011 02:32:53 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20110815074229.GL2182@sun>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

> Hi Al,
> 
> (a bit late reply actually ;)
> 
> but what about first two patches (without per-sb locks)?

Al, taking into account the amount of changes in the dcache should we
rebase patches 1 and 2 and send you again?

Thanks,
Pavel