From: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
xfs@oss.sgi.com, Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Added test case 259 for the btrfs raid features
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 16:55:59 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E899BC7.6070607@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110902084941.GB29054@infradead.org>
Christoph,
apologies for the delay I was on a long leave.
> Also is there a chance you could allow setting
> only SCRATCH_DEV_POOL for btrfs, and derive SCRATCH_DEV for that as an
> additional step?
There is some challenge to set SCRATCH_DEV based on FSTYP since
SCRATCH_DEV is used even before FSTYP is set.
common.config uses SCRATCH_DEV and we set FSTYP in common.
check calls these two script files in the following logic.
--------------------------
# we need common.config
if ! . ./common.config
then
echo "$iam: failed to source common.config"
exit 1
fi
# we need common
. ./common
---------------------------
to avoid major changes what we could do is to find-out FSTYP on our
own in the file common.config and set SCRATCH_DEV based on
SCRATCH_DEV_POOL, but thats a bit ugly way. I am open to any
suggestions. thanks.
> Please use the sysfs interface instead of the deprecated /proc/scsi/scsi
> interface. I would also suggest to split this routine into two for
> removing and adding, and move them to the common helper library, so it
> could be used for other tests.
yes. will get something like below code. in the common
-----
remove:
echo 1 >
/sys/class/scsi_device/${host}:${channel}:${id}:${lun}/device/delete
add:
echo "$channel $id $lun" > /sys/class/scsi_host/host${host}/scan
-----
>> +# we need this to test removing a dev from the system
>> +_require_proc_scsi()
>> +{
>> + [ -e /proc/scsi/scsi ] || _notrun "/proc/scsi/scsi is not present"
>> +}
>
> The _require need really is that the device you want to work on is a
> SCSI device.
will get this.
Thanks -Anand
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-03 8:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-05 7:59 [PATCH] snapshot, defragment and raid test cases for btrfs Anand Jain
2011-08-05 13:53 ` Amir Goldstein
2011-08-05 15:40 ` Greg Freemyer
2011-08-05 21:42 ` Greg Freemyer
2011-08-06 14:06 ` Dave Chinner
2011-08-11 19:52 ` Anand Jain
2011-08-11 20:01 ` [PATCH 1/3] Added test case 257 for btrfs extended snapshot tests Anand Jain
2011-08-15 7:52 ` [PATCH v2 " Anand Jain
2011-09-02 8:45 ` [PATCH " Christoph Hellwig
2011-08-11 20:01 ` [PATCH 2/3] Added test case 258 for btrfs defragmentation Anand Jain
2011-08-11 20:01 ` [PATCH 3/3] Added test case 259 for the btrfs raid features Anand Jain
2011-09-02 8:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-03 11:25 ` Anand Jain [this message]
2011-10-10 9:58 ` [PATCH] Changes to received review comments Anand Jain
2011-10-10 11:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-11 11:25 ` Anand Jain
2011-10-11 11:26 ` [PATCH 1/3] 263: Functional test case for the btrfs snapshot Anand Jain
2011-10-11 11:38 ` David Sterba
2011-10-11 11:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-11 11:47 ` David Sterba
2011-10-11 11:27 ` [PATCH 2/3] 264: Functional test case for the btrfs de-fragmentation Anand Jain
2011-10-11 11:28 ` [PATCH 3/3] 265: Functional test case for the btrfs raid operations Anand Jain
2011-10-12 4:52 ` [PATCH 0/3] xfstest patch Anand Jain
2011-10-12 4:52 ` [PATCH 1/3] 263: Functional test case for the btrfs snapshot Anand Jain
2011-10-13 0:56 ` Dave Chinner
2011-10-18 6:28 ` [PATCH 0/3] xfstests patches Anand Jain
2011-10-18 6:28 ` [PATCH 1/3] 264: Functional test case for the btrfs snapshot Anand Jain
2011-10-19 9:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-20 15:31 ` Anand Jain
2011-10-18 6:28 ` [PATCH 2/3] 265: Functional test case for the btrfs de-fragmentation Anand Jain
2011-10-19 9:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-20 15:32 ` Anand Jain
2011-10-18 6:28 ` [PATCH 3/3] 266: Functional test case for the btrfs raid operations Anand Jain
2011-10-19 9:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-20 15:32 ` Anand Jain
2011-10-20 15:41 ` [PATCH 0/5] xfstests enhancement and bug fix Anand Jain
2011-10-20 15:41 ` [PATCH 1/5] fill files with random data Anand Jain
2011-10-25 11:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-20 15:41 ` [PATCH 2/5] Added SCRATCH_DEV_POOL to specify multiple disks for the btrfs RAID Anand Jain
2011-10-25 11:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-20 15:41 ` [PATCH 3/5] 264: Functional test case for the btrfs snapshot Anand Jain
2011-10-25 11:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-20 15:41 ` [PATCH 4/5] 265: Functional test case for the btrfs raid operations Anand Jain
2011-10-25 11:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-20 15:41 ` [PATCH 5/5] _populate_fs should use OPTIND when getopts is used Anand Jain
2011-10-25 11:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-12 4:52 ` [PATCH 2/3] 264: Functional test case for the btrfs de-fragmentation Anand Jain
2011-10-12 4:52 ` [PATCH 3/3] 265: Functional test case for the btrfs raid operations Anand Jain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E899BC7.6070607@oracle.com \
--to=anand.jain@oracle.com \
--cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).