Re: [PATCH] nfs-utils: mount: really return from errno test

[Steve Dickson <SteveD@redhat.com>]

Yeah... I believe its this one
   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744657

On 10/13/2011 10:53 AM, Chuck Lever wrote:
> What was the presenting problem?  Is there a bugzilla report I can look at?
> 
> On Oct 11, 2011, at 5:44 AM, Hamo wrote:
> 
>> We should only try next address family if we meet ECONNREFUSED or EHOSTUNREACH
>> for v4 or ECONNREFUSED or EOPNOTSUPP or EHOSTUNREACH for v3v2.
>> Before, only a break in swich can not make the program out of for loop.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yang Bai <hamo.by@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> utils/mount/stropts.c |    6 ++++--
>> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/utils/mount/stropts.c b/utils/mount/stropts.c
>> index 314a806..4032bf3 100644
>> --- a/utils/mount/stropts.c
>> +++ b/utils/mount/stropts.c
>> @@ -665,9 +665,10 @@ static int nfs_try_mount_v3v2(struct nfsmount_info *mi)
>> 		case EHOSTUNREACH:
>> 			continue;
>> 		default:
>> -			break;
>> +			goto out;
>> 		}
>> 	}
>> +out:
>> 	return ret;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -751,9 +752,10 @@ static int nfs_try_mount_v4(struct nfsmount_info *mi)
>> 		case EHOSTUNREACH:
>> 			continue;
>> 		default:
>> -			break;
>> +			goto out;
>> 		}
>> 	}
>> +out:
>> 	return ret;
>> }
>>
>> -- 
>> 1.7.1
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>