From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Shea Levy <shea@shealevy.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -V7 00/26]  New ACL format for better NFSv4 acl interoperability
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 12:17:56 -0400
Message-ID: <4E9DA6B4.2010906@shealevy.com>
References: <1318951981-5508-1-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: agruen@kernel.org, bfields@fieldses.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, dhowells@redhat.com,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <1318951981-5508-1-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On 10/18/11 11:32 AM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> More details regarding richacl can be found at
> http://acl.bestbits.at/richacl/
>
FYI, this site says nfs4acls is the successor project of richacls, but 
from what I can see it is actually the predecessor. Is my understanding 
correct, or is nfs4acls the next-gen product here?

Regards,
Shea Levy