From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anand Jain Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] 265: Functional test case for the btrfs de-fragmentation Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 23:32:24 +0800 Message-ID: <4EA03F08.4050400@oracle.com> References: <20111013005652.GM3159@dastard> <1318919336-32206-1-git-send-email-Anand.Jain@oracle.com> <1318919336-32206-3-git-send-email-Anand.Jain@oracle.com> <20111019094356.GC3083@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, david@fromorbit.com To: Christoph Hellwig Return-path: Received: from acsinet15.oracle.com ([141.146.126.227]:22712 "EHLO acsinet15.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754556Ab1JTPco (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Oct 2011 11:32:44 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20111019094356.GC3083@infradead.org> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 19/10/2011 17:43, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 02:28:55PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote: >> To verify the btrfs de-fragmentation does not fail. > > Any reason you can't simply fold btrfs defragmentation testing into > the existing common defragmentation test (218)? oh! 218 ! let me defer defrag for now. will get the other test-cases going. thanks anand