linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Linux Btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ito <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Btrfs: fix deadlock on sb->s_umount when doing umount
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 10:31:35 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EDED007.2070904@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111206213611.GB4029@shiny>

On tue, 6 Dec 2011 16:36:11 -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 06:23:23AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 07:06:40PM +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
>>>> I can't see why you need the writeout when the trylocks fails.  Umount
>>>> needs to take care of writing out all pending file data anyway, so doing
>>>> it from the cleaner thread in addition doesn't sound like it would help.
>>>
>>> umount invokes sync_fs() and write out all the dirty file data. For the
>>> other file systems, its OK because the file system does not introduce dirty pages
>>> by itself. But btrfs is different. Its automatic defragment will make lots of dirty
>>> pages after sync_fs() and reserve lots of meta-data space for those pages.
>>> And then the cleaner thread may find there is no enough space to reserve, it must
>>> sync the dirty file data and release the reserved space which is for the dirty
>>> file data.
>>
>> I think the safest way to fix is is to write out all dirty data again
>> once the cleaner thread has been safely stopped.
>>
> 
> Said another way we want to stop the autodefrag code before the unmount
> is ready to continue.  We also want to stop balancing, scrub etc.

But there is no good interface to do it before umount gets s_umount lock.
I think trylock(in writeback_inodes_sb_nr_if_idle()) + dirty data flush
can help us to fix the bug perfectly.

Thanks
Miao

> 
> -chris
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2011-12-07  2:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-06  5:35 [PATCH 2/2] Btrfs: fix deadlock on sb->s_umount when doing umount Miao Xie
2011-12-06  5:49 ` Al Viro
2011-12-06  6:52   ` Miao Xie
2011-12-06  9:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-12-06 11:06   ` Miao Xie
2011-12-06 11:23     ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-12-06 21:36       ` Chris Mason
2011-12-07  2:31         ` Miao Xie [this message]
2011-12-07 11:11           ` Ilya Dryomov
2011-12-08  3:46             ` Miao Xie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4EDED007.2070904@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=miaox@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).