From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [LSF/MM TOPIC] Copy offload
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 11:27:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F0AC112.2000709@suse.de> (raw)
Quite a lot of discussion has come up recently on supporting Copy
Offload (aka SCSI XCOPY) with linux.
During the course of this several topics were found which need some
discussion:
- Interface: do we need a new syscall? Should we try to resurrect
the original sys_copyfile() approach from Joel Becker?
What are the areas and use-cases this syscall should cover?
- Scope: SCSI XCOPY is not the only possible user here, CIFS and
NFSv4 have similar needs. We should aim for integrating all of
these use-cases. However, we need to revisit them to figure out
if and to what extend they are really compatible.
- Implementation: The new interface is likely to reside on the
filesystem level. To quote Dave Chinner:
> e.g. for an array offload, we have to flush the source file
> page cache first so that the data being copied is known to
> be on disk, then invalidate the destination page cache if
> overwriting or extend and pre-allocate blocks if not. Then
> we have to map both files and hand that off to the array.
>
> Then there's a whole bunch of tricky questions about what
> the state of the destination file should look like while
> the copy is in progress, whether the source file should be
> allowed to change (e.g. it can't be truncated and have
> blocks freed and then reused by other files half way through
> the copy offload operation), and so on.
- Backends: Should we concentrate on the new 'XCOPY LITE' proposal
or should we try to implement the original XCOPY command, too?
I guess this'll warrant a joint session, as at least filesystem and
storage people will be involved here.
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage
hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next reply other threads:[~2012-01-09 10:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-09 10:27 Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2012-01-10 22:11 ` [LSF/MM TOPIC] Copy offload Joel Becker
2012-01-13 19:25 ` Martin K. Petersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F0AC112.2000709@suse.de \
--to=hare@suse.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).