From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Boaz Harrosh Subject: Re: [RFC 4/4] {RFC} kmod.c: Add new call_usermodehelper_timeout() API Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 19:52:37 -0700 Message-ID: <4F6A93F5.1070202@panasas.com> References: <4F691059.30405@panasas.com> <4F691383.5040506@panasas.com> <4F6A92FC.6060702@panasas.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , , , linux-fsdevel , linux-kernel , NFS list , Trond Myklebust , "Bhamare, Sachin" , David Howells , Eric Paris , "Srivatsa S. Bhat" , Kay Sievers , James Morris , "Eric W. Biederman" , Greg KH , Rusty Russell , Tejun Heo , David Rientjes To: Andrew Morton , Tetsuo Handa , Oleg Nesterov Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4F6A92FC.6060702@panasas.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On 03/21/2012 07:48 PM, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > On 03/20/2012 04:32 PM, Boaz Harrosh wrote: >> > > Please review my patchset above, and comment. If you guys want I can combine > the two sets into one patchset ASAP. (Will try to finish an RFC tomorrow) > Since we are inventing the same mechanisms for slightly different needs. > But basically we both need support for the waiter to be returning before > the child has completed. > I forgot to ask, what is the official git tree for these patches? Currently I picked them up from the linux-next/master tree. Is there a more stable source for these? (Though I can just carry them as a patchset, I'll need to rebase them anyway) > Thanks > Boaz