From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [PATCH] nextfd(2) Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2012 15:05:53 -0700 Message-ID: <4F78D141.4070609@zytor.com> References: <20120401125741.GA7484@p183.telecom.by> <201204011921.59596.arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Alexey Dobriyan , akpm@linux-foundation.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, drepper@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Arnd Bergmann Return-path: In-Reply-To: <201204011921.59596.arnd@arndb.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On 04/01/2012 12:21 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Sunday 01 April 2012, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: >> arch/x86/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl | 1 + >> arch/x86/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl | 1 + >> fs/Makefile | 1 + >> fs/nextfd.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> include/linux/syscalls.h | 1 + >> 5 files changed, 31 insertions(+) > > I don't have any comments on the syscall itself, but when you add one, please > also make the change to include/asm-generic/unistd.h so it appears in the > various architectures using the generic syscall table. > > Arnd Arnd: do you have any interest in leveraging the syscall scripts I did for x86? I have tried to make them as generic as possible, with the hope of getting more and more of syscall information into more easily processed form. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.