From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Boaz Harrosh Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] remove no longer use of pdflush interface Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 10:31:12 +0300 Message-ID: <4FCF0740.1040204@panasas.com> References: <1338888372-3555-1-git-send-email-liwp.linux@gmail.com> <20120605152845.8b633881.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Wanpeng Li , Fengguang Wu , Rob Landley , Alexander Viro , "Eric W. Biederman" , Lucas De Marchi , "David S. Miller" , Jan Kara , Mel Gorman , Minchan Kim , David Howells , James Morris , Ingo Molnar , Michel Lespinasse , , , , Gavin Shan , Wanpeng Li To: Andrew Morton Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120605152845.8b633881.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On 06/06/2012 01:28 AM, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 5 Jun 2012 17:26:11 +0800 > Wanpeng Li wrote: > > So perhaps the solution is to give up on the generic proc_obsolete() > idea, and just add a handler specifically for nr_pdflush_threads, whcih > uses printk_once(). > If there are many users than a self made print once is worth it we can use the ctl_table->data pointer for this, some thing like: int nr_pdflush_was_printed; @@ -1095,11 +1095,9 @@ static struct ctl_table vm_table[] = { .extra1 = &zero, }, { - .procname = "nr_pdflush_threads", - .data = &nr_pdflush_threads, - .maxlen = sizeof nr_pdflush_threads, - .mode = 0444 /* read-only*/, - .proc_handler = proc_dointvec, + .data = &nr_pdflush_was_printed, + .procname = "nr_pdflush_threads", + .mode = 0444 /* read-only */, + .proc_handler = proc_obsolete, }, +/* notice associated proc deprecated */ +int proc_deprecated(struct ctl_table *table, int write, + void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos, ) +{ + if (*ctl_table->data) { + printk(KERN_WARNING "%s exported in /proc is deprecated\n", + table->procname); + *ctl_table->data = 0; + } + return -ENOSYS; +}