From: Jeff Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] tmpfs: revert SEEK_DATA and SEEK_HOLE
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 11:21:26 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FFE42B6.5080705@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120711230122.GZ19223@dastard>
On 07/12/2012 07:01 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:55:34AM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
>> On Wed, 11 Jul 2012, Cong Wang wrote:
>>> On Mon, 09 Jul 2012 at 22:41 GMT, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> wrote:
>>>> Revert 4fb5ef089b28 ("tmpfs: support SEEK_DATA and SEEK_HOLE").
>>>> I believe it's correct, and it's been nice to have from rc1 to rc6;
>>>> but as the original commit said:
>>>>
>>>> I don't know who actually uses SEEK_DATA or SEEK_HOLE, and whether it
>>>> would be of any use to them on tmpfs. This code adds 92 lines and 752
>>>> bytes on x86_64 - is that bloat or worthwhile?
>>>
>>>
>>> I don't think 752 bytes matter much, especially for x86_64.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Nobody asked for it, so I conclude that it's bloat: let's revert tmpfs
>>>> to the dumb generic support for v3.5. We can always reinstate it later
>>>> if useful, and anyone needing it in a hurry can just get it out of git.
>>>>
>>>
>>> If you don't have burden to maintain it, I'd prefer to leave as it is,
>>> I don't think 752-bytes is the reason we revert it.
>>
>> Thank you, your vote has been counted ;)
>> and I'll be glad if yours stimulates some agreement or disagreement.
>>
>> But your vote would count for a lot more if you know of some app which
>> would really benefit from this functionality in tmpfs: I've heard of none.
>
> So what? I've heard of no apps that use this functionality on XFS,
> either, but I have heard of a lot of people asking for it to be
> implemented over the past couple of years so they can use it.
> There's been patches written to make coreutils (cp) make use of it
> instead of parsing FIEMAP output to find holes, though I don't know
> if that's gone beyond more than "here's some patches"...
Yes, for apps, cp(1) will make use of it to replace the old FIEMAP for efficient sparse file copy.
I have implemented an extent-scan module to coreutils a few years ago,
http://fossies.org/dox/coreutils-8.17/extent-scan_8c_source.html
It does extent scan through FIEMAP, however, SEEK_DATA/SEEK_HOLE is more convenient and easy to use
considering the call interface. So FIEMAP will be replaced by SEEK_XXX once it got supported by EXT4.
Moreover, I have discussed with Jim who is the coreutils maintainer previously, He would like to post
extent-scan module to Gnulib so that other GNU utilities which are relied on Gnulib might be a potential
user of it, at least, GNU tar will definitely need it for sparse file backup.
>
> Besides, given that you can punch holes in tmpfs files, it seems
> strange to then say "we don't need a method of skipping holes to
> find data quickly"....
So its deserve to keep this feature working on tmpfs considering hole punch. :)
Thanks,
-Jeff
>
> Besides, seek-hole/data is still shiny new and lots of developers
> aren't even aware of it's presence in recent kernels. Removing new
> functionality saying "no-one is using it" is like smashing the egg
> before the chicken hatches (or is it cutting of the chickes's head
> before it lays the egg?).
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-12 3:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <alpine.LSU.2.00.1207091533001.2051@eggly.anvils>
2012-07-09 22:41 ` [PATCH 1/3] tmpfs: revert SEEK_DATA and SEEK_HOLE Hugh Dickins
2012-07-11 6:07 ` Cong Wang
2012-07-11 18:55 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-07-11 23:01 ` Dave Chinner
2012-07-12 2:50 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-07-12 3:21 ` Jeff Liu [this message]
2012-07-16 9:28 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-07-17 6:15 ` Jeff Liu
2012-07-31 14:30 ` Jim Meyering
2012-07-31 14:42 ` Jim Meyering
2012-08-08 2:08 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-08-14 17:03 ` Paul Eggert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FFE42B6.5080705@oracle.com \
--to=jeff.liu@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).