From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>,
oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, lkp@intel.com,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, ltp@lists.linux.it,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [jlayton:ctime] [ext4] ff9aaf58e8: ltp.statx06.fail
Date: Tue, 02 May 2023 06:12:24 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <500fc91b75ef67263825cf3410a8a66c7bc0fd85.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230502003929.GG2155823@dread.disaster.area>
On Tue, 2023-05-02 at 10:39 +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 12:05:17PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > On Mon, 2023-05-01 at 22:09 +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> > The test does this:
> >
> > SAFE_CLOCK_GETTIME(CLOCK_REALTIME_COARSE, &before_time);
> > clock_wait_tick();
> > tc->operation();
> > clock_wait_tick();
> > SAFE_CLOCK_GETTIME(CLOCK_REALTIME_COARSE, &after_time);
> >
> > ...and with that, I usually end up with before/after_times that are 1ns
> > apart, since my machine is reporting a 1ns granularity.
> >
> > The first problem is that the coarse grained timestamps represent the
> > lower bound of what time could end up in the inode. With multigrain
> > ctimes, we can end up grabbing a fine-grained timestamp to store in the
> > inode that will be later than either coarse grained time that was
> > fetched.
> >
> > That's easy enough to fix -- grab a coarse time for "before" and a fine-
> > grained time for "after".
> >
> > The clock_getres function though returns that it has a 1ns granularity
> > (since it does). With multigrain ctimes, we no longer have that at the
> > filesystem level. It's a 2ns granularity now (as we need the lowest bit
> > for the flag).
>
> Why are you even using the low bit for this? Nanosecond resolution
> only uses 30 bits, leaving the upper two bits of a 32 bit tv_nsec
> field available for internal status bits. As long as we mask out the
> internal bits when reading the VFS timestamp tv_nsec field, then
> we don't need to change the timestamp resolution, right?
>
Yeah, that should work. Let me give that a shot on the next pass.
Thanks,
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-02 10:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <202305012130.cc1e2351-oliver.sang@intel.com>
2023-05-01 16:05 ` [jlayton:ctime] [ext4] ff9aaf58e8: ltp.statx06.fail Jeff Layton
2023-05-02 0:39 ` Dave Chinner
2023-05-02 10:12 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=500fc91b75ef67263825cf3410a8a66c7bc0fd85.camel@kernel.org \
--to=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
--cc=oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).