linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ankit Jain <jankit@suse.de>
To: Zach Brown <zab@zabbo.net>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	bcrl@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-aio@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Make io_submit non-blocking
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 01:47:24 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50105454.5080400@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120724223702.GB6723@lenny.home.zabbo.net>

On 07/25/2012 04:07 AM, Zach Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 05:11:05PM +0530, Ankit Jain wrote:
[snip]
>> With this patch, io_submit prepares all the kiocbs and then
>> adds (kicks) them to ctx->run_list (kicked) in one go and then
>> schedules the workqueue. The actual operations are not executed
>> on io_submit's process context, so it can return very quickly.
> 
> Strong nack; this isn't safe without having done the work to ensure that
> all the task_struct references under the f_op->aio_*() paths won't be
> horribly confused to find a kernel thread instead of the process that
> called io_submit().
> 
> The one-off handling of the submitters's cred is an indication that
> there might be other cases to worry about :).

Makes sense, I will try to look into this.

>> 3. Also, I tried not using aio_queue_work from io_submit call, and instead
>> depending on an already scheduled one or the iocbs being run when
>> io_getevents gets called. This seemed to give improved perfomance. But
>> does this constitute as change of api semantics?
> 
> You can't rely on io_getevents() being called for forward progress.  Its
> perfectly reasonable for a task to wait for io completion by polling an
> eventfd that aio_complete() notifies, for instance.

Ah okay, didn't realize that.

Thanks,
-- 
Ankit Jain
SUSE Labs


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-aio' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux AIO,
see: http://www.kvack.org/aio/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org">aart@kvack.org</a>

      reply	other threads:[~2012-07-25 20:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-24 11:41 [RFC][PATCH] Make io_submit non-blocking Ankit Jain
2012-07-24 12:34 ` Rajat Sharma
2012-07-24 20:27   ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-07-24 22:31 ` Dave Chinner
2012-07-24 22:50   ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-07-24 23:08     ` Zach Brown
2012-07-26 19:52     ` Ankit Jain
2012-07-26 21:43       ` Zach Brown
2012-07-25 20:12   ` Ankit Jain
2012-07-24 22:37 ` Zach Brown
2012-07-25 20:17   ` Ankit Jain [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50105454.5080400@suse.de \
    --to=jankit@suse.de \
    --cc=bcrl@kvack.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-aio@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=zab@zabbo.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).