linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vincent ETIENNE <vetienne@aprogsys.com>
To: Vincent ETIENNE <ve@vetienne.net>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Subject: Re: kernel BUG at fs/buffer.c:2886! Linux 3.5.0
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 18:51:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50195E74.6030107@aprogsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5016D2C0.6090708@vetienne.net>



Some progress

the fallocate bug is not the only bug
latest head with the fallocate correction still crash
( in read_blocks )

So i have restart bisection but at each stage i reinject the fallocate
patch ( is it a corerct way to do this ?)
Bisection is not very fast but for the moment (sometimes i need to rebot
harsly and it kicks a rebuild of the raid array ) :

git bisect start
# bad: [2d534926205db9ffce4bbbde67cb9b2cee4b835c] Merge tag
'irqdomain-for-linus' of git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6
git bisect bad 2d534926205db9ffce4bbbde67cb9b2cee4b835c
# good: [c3b92c8787367a8bb53d57d9789b558f1295cc96] Linux 3.1
git bisect good c3b92c8787367a8bb53d57d9789b558f1295cc96
# good: [95211279c5ad00a317c98221d7e4365e02f20836] Merge branch 'akpm'
(Andrew's patch-bomb)
git bisect good 95211279c5ad00a317c98221d7e4365e02f20836
# good: [654443e20dfc0617231f28a07c96a979ee1a0239] Merge branch
'perf-uprobes-for-linus' of
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
git bisect good 654443e20dfc0617231f28a07c96a979ee1a0239
# bad: [f0a08fcb5972167e55faa330c4a24fbaa3328b1f] Merge
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cmetcalf/linux-tile
git bisect bad f0a08fcb5972167e55faa330c4a24fbaa3328b1f
# bad: [f5e7e844a571124ffc117d4696787d6afc4fc5ae] Merge tag
'for-linus-3.5-20120601' of git://git.infradead.org/linux-mtd
git bisect bad f5e7e844a571124ffc117d4696787d6afc4fc5ae

Each bad has failed with the read_block OOPS ( so somewhat consistent
for now )




Le 30/07/2012 20:30, Vincent ETIENNE a écrit :
>
>
> On 30/07/2012 09:53, Joel Becker wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 09:45:14AM +0200, Vincent ETIENNE wrote:
>>> Le 30/07/2012 08:30, Joel Becker a écrit :
>>>> On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 12:18:30AM +0200, Vincent ETIENNE wrote:
>>>>> Hello
>>>>>
>>>>> Get this on first write made ( by deliver sending mail to inform of the
>>>>> restart of services  )
>>>>> Home partition (the one receiving the mail) is based on ocfs2 created
>>>>> from drbd block device in primary/primary mode
>>>>> These drbd devices are based on lvm.
>>>>>
>>>>> system is running linux-3.5.0, identical symptom with linux 3.3 and 3.2
>>>>> but working with linux 3.0 kernel
>>>>>
>>>>> reproduced on two machines ( so different hardware involved on this one
>>>>> software md raid on SATA, on second one areca hardware raid card )
>>>>> but the 2 machines are the one sharing this partition ( so share the
>>>>> same data )
>>>> 	Hmm.  Any chance you can bisect this further?
>>> Will try to. Will take a few days as the server is in production ( but
>>> used as backup so...)
>>>
>>>>> Jul 27 23:41:41 jupiter2 kernel: [  351.169213] ------------[ cut here
>>>>> ]------------
>>>>> Jul 27 23:41:41 jupiter2 kernel: [  351.169261] kernel BUG at
>>>>> fs/buffer.c:2886!
>>>> 	This is:
>>>>
>>>> 	BUG_ON(!buffer_mapped(bh));
>>>>
>>>> in submit_bh().
>>>>
>>>> system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
>>>> 	This stack trace is from 3.5, because of the location of the
>>>> BUG.  The call path in the trace suggests the code added by Al's ea022d,
>>>> but you say it breaks in 3.2 and 3.3 as well.  Can you give me a trace
>>>> from 3.2?
>>> For a 3.2 kernel i get this stack trace. Different trace form 3.5 but
>>> exactly at the same moment. and for the same reasons.
>>> Seems to be less immmediate than with 3.5 but more a subjective
>>> imrpession than something based on fact. ( it takes a few seconds after
>>> deliver is started to have the bug )
>> Totally different stack trace.  Not in symlink code, but instead in
>> fallocate.  Weird.  I wonder if you are hitting two things.  Bisection
>> will definitely help.
> Yes could be, that would explain the 2 stack trace ( and the different
> timing observed )
> Bisection is in progress. The fallocate bug is certainly already
> corrected ( info sent by
> sunil.mushran@gmail.com but unavailable on the list for the moment  ?)
>
> ------
>
> The fallocate() oops is probably the same that is fixed by this patch.
> https://oss.oracle.com/git/?p=smushran/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=a2118b301104a24381b414bc93371d666fe8d43a
>
>
> Is in the list of patches that are ready to be pushed.
> https://oss.oracle.com/git/?p=smushran/linux-2.6.git;a=shortlog;h=mw-3.4-mar15
>
> ----
>
> But not sure it will correct all i observed. So i will continue to
> bisect to confirm/infirm.
> ( But i seems to have lost network on my server after a reboot and so no
> more access before tomorrow , I have certainly forget to do make
> modules_install before installing new kernel ... Being stupid is not
> very helpful... ) . I hope to finish the bisection tomorrow or wednesday.
>  
> Thanks a lot for the support.
>> Joel
>>
>>

  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-01 16:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-27 22:18 kernel BUG at fs/buffer.c:2886! Linux 3.5.0 Vincent ETIENNE
2012-07-30  6:30 ` Joel Becker
2012-07-30  7:45   ` Vincent ETIENNE
2012-07-30  7:53     ` Joel Becker
2012-07-30 15:59       ` Sunil Mushran
2012-07-30 18:30       ` Vincent ETIENNE
2012-08-01 16:51         ` Vincent ETIENNE [this message]
2012-08-01 20:43         ` Vincent ETIENNE
2012-08-01 20:46           ` Vincent ETIENNE
2012-08-02  7:21             ` Vincent ETIENNE
2012-08-02 19:28               ` Vincent ETIENNE
2012-08-02 21:08                 ` Sunil Mushran
2012-08-03  7:22                   ` Vincent ETIENEN

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50195E74.6030107@aprogsys.com \
    --to=vetienne@aprogsys.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
    --cc=ve@vetienne.net \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).