From: Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@gmail.com>
To: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@gmail.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] writeback: fix incorrect return value type of bdi_dirty_limit
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 12:35:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5030C17E.5050906@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5030BE93.50909@gmail.com>
Il 19/08/2012 12:23, Marco Stornelli ha scritto:
> Il 19/08/2012 04:17, Fengguang Wu ha scritto:
>> On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 05:49:21AM -0400, Namjae Jeon wrote:
>>> unsigned long bdi_dirty_limit(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, unsigned
>>> long dirty)
>>>
>>> Above function return type is unsigned long, but return value is
>>> kept in "u64 bdi_dirty".
>>> It can return incorrect value by type casting.
>>
>> I don't see how the cast can return wrong value.
>> The u64 is necessary for the intermediate calculations.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Fengguang
>>
>
> We are sure u64 is 8byte long, but unsigned long is 4byte long on 32-bit
> machine, so if bdi_dirty can assume values bigger than 2^32 there is an
> implicit truncate of its value, isn't it?
>
> Marco
Sorry but I didn't see the code, it seems not possible so the wrong
situation can't happen. Maybe we can simply add a comment, nothing more.
Marco
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-19 10:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1345283361-7802-1-git-send-email-linkinjeon@gmail.com>
2012-08-19 2:17 ` [PATCH 2/3] writeback: fix incorrect return value type of bdi_dirty_limit Fengguang Wu
2012-08-19 10:23 ` Marco Stornelli
2012-08-19 10:35 ` Marco Stornelli [this message]
2012-08-19 23:49 ` Namjae Jeon
2012-08-20 0:09 ` Namjae Jeon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5030C17E.5050906@gmail.com \
--to=marco.stornelli@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=linkinjeon@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).