From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Boaz Harrosh Subject: Re: [patch 4/8] fs, exportfs: Add export_encode_inode_fh helper Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 15:51:36 +0300 Message-ID: <50338458.7090602@panasas.com> References: <20120820183225.GB4911@fieldses.org> <20120820190606.GE27443@moon> <20120820193204.GD5779@fieldses.org> <50335261.5090504@parallels.com> <87wr0sle4v.fsf@skywalker.in.ibm.com> <503367CB.9080609@parallels.com> <20120821105424.GA7670@moon> <50336C51.60501@parallels.com> <20120821121155.GC9483@fieldses.org> <50337D87.90607@parallels.com> <20120821122908.GE9483@fieldses.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Pavel Emelyanov , "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , Al Viro , Cyrill Gorcunov , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , Alexey Dobriyan , Andrew Morton , James Bottomley , Matthew Helsley To: "J. Bruce Fields" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120821122908.GE9483@fieldses.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On 08/21/2012 03:29 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: <> > OK. So if you don't mind the fact that there are filesystems with > inotify support but not filehandle support, then I think generating a > filehandle early as you describe would work. I guess it's a little more > memory per watched inode. > For the minority of FSs that do not have a filehandle support it should be easy to generate a generic one, that should work 95% of the time. Are we guaranteed that after the checkpoint restore the version of the Kernel is the same as the one that did the checkpoint? If yes then I don't see any problem. > --b. Cheers Boaz