From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Jesper Krogh" <jesper@krogh.cc>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.26-rc4
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 09:02:26 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <50414.195.41.66.226.1213254146.squirrel@mail.jabbernet.dk>
References: <20080603105258.GV28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
    <1212499623.3025.46.camel@raven.themaw.net>
    <alpine.LFD.1.10.0806030751040.3473@woody.linux-foundation.org>
    <1212509263.3025.66.camel@raven.themaw.net>
    <alpine.LFD.1.10.0806030926330.3473@woody.linux-foundation.org>
    <1212513189.3025.101.camel@raven.themaw.net>
    <20080603173029.GD28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
    <x49ej7ejtry.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
    <20080603191859.GG28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
    <x49abi2jnwf.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
    <20080603230026.GH28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
    <1212547323.3146.45.camel@raven.themaw.net>
    <1213073861.3024.34.camel@raven.themaw.net>
    <484E1F20.4060804@krogh.cc>
    <1213080010.3024.42.camel@raven.themaw.net>
    <1213239782.4994.79.camel@raven.themaw.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Cc: "Jesper Krogh" <jesper@krogh.cc>,
	"Al Viro" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	"Jeff Moyer" <jmoyer@redhat.com>,
	"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Miklos Szeredi" <miklos@szeredi.hu>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: "Ian Kent" <raven@themaw.net>
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from 2605ds1-ynoe.1.fullrate.dk ([90.184.12.24]:48137 "EHLO
	shrek.krogh.cc" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1756686AbYFLHCj (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 12 Jun 2008 03:02:39 -0400
In-Reply-To: <1213239782.4994.79.camel@raven.themaw.net>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

> On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 14:40 +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> The patch below is sufficiently different to the original patch I posted
> to warrant a replacement rather than a correction.

I'll patch that in now and see what it gives. (Is it preferred
to use this --ghost option or not?) What would you suggest?

Jesper
-- 
Jesper Krogh