linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jagdish Motwani <jagdish.motwani@elitecore.com>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: performance degradation on kernel upgrade (due to commit ab0a9735e06914ce4d2a94ffa41497dbc142fe7f)
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 11:15:02 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <505FF35E.6020506@elitecore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201209211625.42895.andres@anarazel.de>

On 09/21/2012 07:55 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Friday, September 21, 2012 03:47:56 PM Jagdish Motwani wrote:
>> Recently i upgraded my kernel from 2.6.29.6 to 2.6.35.14.
>>
>> After upgrading i got very poor performance on my postgre database.
>>
>>
>> My test.sql contains 10000 postgre insert query
>>
>>
>> Linux  2.6.29.6
>>
>> time psql -U user -d database -f test.sql  > /dev/null
>> real    0m 7.23s
>> user    0m 0.38s
>> sys     0m 0.12s
>>
>>
>>
>> Linux  2.6.35.14
>>
>> # time psql -U user -d database -f test.sql  > /dev/null
>> real    1m 4.05s
>> user    0m 0.44s
>> sys    0m 0.12
> How do the results to this look if you use psql -1/--single-transaction?
Using single transaction solves the problem - but that's not what i 
really want.
>
>> I even tried Linux 3.5.4 and got similar results.
>>
>> Using git bisect, i got commit ab0a9735e06914ce4d2a94ffa41497dbc142fe7f
>>
>> Is it a behavior change or am i missing something? Are there any
>> workarounds for this?
> I guess youre using some form of virtualization? I think what youre observing
> is just that access via raw devices previously lied about consistency. As the
> commit observes several virtualization solutions can use raw device access.
>
> If all those 10000 inserts above happen in individual transactions - which
> would happen if youre not using transactions explicitly -  each and every one
> of them will cause a single disk write if they are executed sequentially.
> A typical rotating disks can do between 80-160 such writes. If you devide 10k
> transactions by 150 synchronous writes a second you get ~66s which pretty
> nicely fits your time above.
>
> If you don't care about loosing a very small amount of transactions (up to a
> second with the default settings) you can disable the synchronous_commit
> setting in postgres. No earlier commits/changes will be lost/corrupted.
> You can change that setting per transaction, per session/connection, per user,
> per database or globally.
>
> Greetings,
>
> Andres
Thanks Andres,

I disabled synchronous_commit, and got results similar to 2.6.32.

Regards,
Jagdish Motwani

      reply	other threads:[~2012-09-24  5:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-21 13:47 performance degradation on kernel upgrade (due to commit ab0a9735e06914ce4d2a94ffa41497dbc142fe7f ) Jagdish Motwani
2012-09-21 14:17 ` Jeff Moyer
2012-09-21 14:25 ` performance degradation on kernel upgrade (due to commit ab0a9735e06914ce4d2a94ffa41497dbc142fe7f) Andres Freund
2012-09-24  5:45   ` Jagdish Motwani [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=505FF35E.6020506@elitecore.com \
    --to=jagdish.motwani@elitecore.com \
    --cc=andres@anarazel.de \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).