From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Paton J. Lewis" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] epoll: Support for disabling items, and a self-test app. Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 17:25:39 -0700 Message-ID: <5089D883.1010704@adobe.com> References: <1345756535-8372-1-git-send-email-palewis@adobe.com> <5086D27F.1000007@adobe.com> <5086ECDE.4030300@suse.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "mtk.manpages@gmail.com" , Alexander Viro , Andrew Morton , Jason Baron , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Paul Holland , Davide Libenzi , "libc-alpha@sourceware.org" , Linux API To: Andreas Jaeger Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5086ECDE.4030300@suse.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On 10/23/12 12:15 PM, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > On 10/23/2012 07:23 PM, Paton J. Lewis wrote: >> [Re-sending without HTML formatting; all vger.kernel.org destination >> addresses bounced my original response.] >> >> On 10/16/12 8:12 AM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: >>> [CC += linux-api@] >> >> Thank you; is this sufficient to coordinate the required changes to the >> glibc version of epoll.h? > > Paton, we normally review the diffs between kernel versions but noticing > us via libc-alpha is great. > > So, you ask to get this added to ? > > #define EPOLL_CTL_DISABLE 4 Yes, that's correct (assuming that v3 the patch proposal is approved). > Once 3.7 is out and contains it, we will add it. A friendly reminder > once the patch is in would be nice so that we don't miss it during the > review. > > thanks, > Andreas > Thank you, Pat