From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vladislav Bolkhovitin Subject: Re: [sqlite] light weight write barriers Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 20:15:36 -0400 Message-ID: <509310A8.6010607@vlnb.net> References: <5086F5A7.9090406@vlnb.net> <20121025051445.GA9860@thunk.org> <508B3EED.2080003@vlnb.net> <20121027044456.GA2764@thunk.org> <5090532D.4050902@vlnb.net> <20121031095404.0ac18a4b@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk> <5092D90F.7020105@vlnb.net> <20121101212418.140e3a82@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Theodore Ts'o , =?UTF-8?B?5p2o6IuP56uLIFlhbmcgU3UgTGk=?= , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, drh@hwaci.com To: Alan Cox Return-path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.171]:58416 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751555Ab2KBAP5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Nov 2012 20:15:57 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20121101212418.140e3a82@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Alan Cox, on 11/01/2012 05:24 PM wrote: >> How about that recently preliminary infrastructure to send ORDERED commands >> instead of queue draining was deleted from the kernel, because "there's no >> difference where to drain the queue, on the kernel or the storage side"? > > Send patches. OK, then we have a good progress! Vlad