From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] fs: Return EAGAIN when O_NONBLOCK write should
 block on frozen fs
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 10:23:12 +0100
Message-ID: <509E1D00.50107@gmail.com>
References: <1352378498-30625-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	dchinner@redhat.com
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-ea0-f174.google.com ([209.85.215.174]:51878 "EHLO
	mail-ea0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1750699Ab2KJJ3t (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 10 Nov 2012 04:29:49 -0500
Received: by mail-ea0-f174.google.com with SMTP id c13so1757698eaa.19
        for <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 01:29:48 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1352378498-30625-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

Il 08/11/2012 13:41, Jan Kara ha scritto:
> When user asks for O_NONBLOCK behavior for a file descriptor, return
> EAGAIN instead of blocking on a frozen filesystem.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> ---

It seems good. Since we have changed a bit the behavior, what do you 
think to replace the uninterruptible sleeping with killable sleeping in 
this context?

Marco