From: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
To: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: <linux-mm@kvack.org>, <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Dave Shrinnker <david@fromorbit.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] sl[auo]b: retry allocation once in case of failure.
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 11:55:09 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50DAAD5D.9020505@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50DA5DE3.9060809@jp.fujitsu.com>
Hello Kame,
>> diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c
>> index a98295f..7e82f99 100644
>> --- a/mm/slab.c
>> +++ b/mm/slab.c
>> @@ -3535,6 +3535,8 @@ slab_alloc_node(struct kmem_cache *cachep, gfp_t flags, int nodeid,
>> cache_alloc_debugcheck_before(cachep, flags);
>> local_irq_save(save_flags);
>> objp = __do_slab_alloc_node(cachep, flags, nodeid);
>> + if (slab_should_retry(objp, flags))
>> + objp = __do_slab_alloc_node(cachep, flags, nodeid);
>
> 3 questions.
>
> 1. why can't we do retry in memcg's code (or kmem/memcg code) rather than slab.c ?
Due to two main reasons:
a. this is not memcg/kmemcg specific. I used kmemcg to make the
container very small, therefore, more likely. But it can also happen in
non-constrained systems.
b. memcg hooks into the page allocation. This patchset deals with cases
in which we can't, really, allocate a new page. However, we are
confident that we could allocate a new *object* should we retry.
> 2. It should be retries even if memory allocator returns NULL page ?
Yes, this is the whole point of this exercise. When we return a NULL
page, we are almost certain to have called reclaim. Reclaim will call
shrink_slab(), that may free objects within a page. So if we retry, we
may now find space within the page, even if we can't have a full page.
> 3. What's relationship with oom-killer ? The first __do_slab_alloc() will not
> invoke oom-killer and returns NULL ?
>
Good question. In all my testing, I've never seen the oom killer be
invoked for failed slab allocations, for either slab or slub. What I
usually see is just the allocator giving up and flooding the log with
failure messages. It seemed logical to me, so I never really asked
myself why wasn't the oom killer invoked. (It usually is invoked right
after if I fire a user memory hog). Perhaps someone can shed a light on
the subject?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-26 7:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-19 14:01 [PATCH 0/3] retry slab allocation after first failure Glauber Costa
2012-12-19 14:01 ` [PATCH 1/3] slab: single entry-point for slab allocation Glauber Costa
2012-12-19 14:01 ` [PATCH 2/3] slub: remove slab_alloc wrapper Glauber Costa
2013-01-02 16:03 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-12-19 14:01 ` [PATCH 3/3] sl[auo]b: retry allocation once in case of failure Glauber Costa
2012-12-26 2:16 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-12-26 7:55 ` Glauber Costa [this message]
2013-01-02 16:10 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-01-09 10:25 ` Glauber Costa
2013-01-02 16:32 ` [PATCH 0/3] retry slab allocation after first failure Christoph Lameter
2013-01-09 10:22 ` Glauber Costa
2013-01-09 15:38 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-01-09 15:59 ` Glauber Costa
2013-01-09 18:59 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-01-02 16:33 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50DAAD5D.9020505@parallels.com \
--to=glommer@parallels.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).