From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Kleikamp Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 00/30] loop: Issue O_DIRECT aio using bio_vec Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 15:51:58 -0600 Message-ID: <50F0897E.6080607@oracle.com> References: <1357761525-22718-1-git-send-email-dave.kleikamp@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Zach Brown , "Maxim V. Patlasov" To: sedat.dilek@gmail.com Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On 01/10/2013 09:46 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > Hi Dave, > > I am using here Ubuntu/precise AMD64 as a WUBI-installed system. > > Not sure if WUBI [1] is a good test-candidate. > > [ /boot/grub/grub.cfg ] > ... > set root=(loop0) > linux /boot/vmlinuz-3.8.0-rc2-9-iniza-generic > root=UUID=001AADA61AAD9964 loop=/ubuntu/disks/root.disk ro > ... > > Poops, I did it (not again) but for the first time to test your > loop-patchset on top of Linux v3.8-rc2 plus some important other stuff > (see patches/ dir in attached tarball). > > As I did not know how to test it in a meaningful way I just run the > "lite" test-script from LTP [2]. > Please, have a look at the ERRORs and failures. I'd really like to know if these same testcases fail without my patchset. I'm going to play with ltp on loop-mounted filesystems, but I don't intend to play with WUBI at all. I'd be interested if my patchset introduces regressions, but not so much if the same testcases fail previously. > $ egrep -i 'error|fail' > for-dkleikamp/tests/runltplite-results_loop-experimental.txt | grep -v > -i expected | wc -l > 210 > > In good old German tradition I have collected some interesting stuff > in the attached tarball ;-). > If something is missing - blame me. > Don't hesitate to ask (I have your patchset for a while on my radar). > > Thanks! > > Regards, > - Sedat - > > [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/WubiGuide > [2] http://sourceforge.net/projects/ltp/