From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Kleikamp Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 00/30] loop: Issue O_DIRECT aio using bio_vec Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 16:33:02 -0600 Message-ID: <50F9CD9E.1050902@oracle.com> References: <1357761525-22718-1-git-send-email-dave.kleikamp@oracle.com> <50F98D29.6050701@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Zach Brown , "Maxim V. Patlasov" To: Jeff Moyer Return-path: Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:48232 "EHLO aserp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751092Ab3ARWdK (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jan 2013 17:33:10 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 01/18/2013 03:48 PM, Jeff Moyer wrote: > Dave Kleikamp writes: > >> On 01/18/2013 11:56 AM, Jeff Moyer wrote: >>> Jeff Moyer writes: >>> >>>> ./check -g aio >>>> >>>> and here is the summary: >>>> >>>> Ran: 112 113 198 207 208 209 210 211 212 239 240 >>>> Failures: 112 198 207 239 240 >>>> Failed 5 of 11 tests >>>> >>>> To be fair, I have not yet run this on a kernel without your changes. >>> >>> I re-ran the same test against a vanilla 3.8.0-rc4 kernel and it passed: >>> >>> Ran: 112 113 198 207 208 209 210 211 212 239 240 >>> Passed all 11 tests >>> >>> I'll start digging into the failures. >> >> Thanks, I'll take a look at it too. > > Note that the failures occur on regular block devices, too; this isn't > restricted to loop. The fix I mentioned in reply to patch 17 actually > fixes all of the failures reported in the aio group. I'm going to do > some more thorough testing over the weekend. Thanks much. I'll definitely add this to my testing. Shaggy > > Cheers, > Jeff >