From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Boaz Harrosh Subject: [8/8] Fix fsnotify short comings (single fd with recursive notifications). Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 13:45:47 +0300 Message-ID: <51629FDB.5090708@panasas.com> References: <516299A5.8030109@panasas.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Steven Whitehouse , Steve Dickson , Jeff Layton , , linux-fsdevel , Ganesha NFS List , Frank S Filz , "J. Bruce Fields" , "Lieb, Jim" , Venkateswararao Jujjuri , DENIEL Philippe Return-path: Received: from natasha.panasas.com ([67.152.220.90]:54863 "EHLO natasha.panasas.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S936765Ab3DHKsD (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Apr 2013 06:48:03 -0400 In-Reply-To: <516299A5.8030109@panasas.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: DENIEL Philippe DENIEL Has reported that watching directories through the new fsnotify API, might miss some events like deletes and that a directory watch is not recursive, which means that we need to open two fd(s) for each directory in the cache. (Which halves our fd cache size). Again from the top of my head, and I know nothing of this subject. DENIEL please add any information here, so we can talk about it at LSF. Thanks Boaz