From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael Kerrisk" Subject: Re: [patch 0/4 v2] vfs: fix utimensat() non-conformances to spec Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 15:22:17 +0200 Message-ID: <517f3f820806040622j5a5b4cb0m9baacbc4ad79c779@mail.gmail.com> References: <484694C1.7030603@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: lkml , "Christoph Hellwig" , "Miklos Szeredi" , viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, jamie@shareable.org, "Ulrich Drepper" , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, "Subrata Modak" To: "Andrew Morton" Return-path: Received: from qb-out-0506.google.com ([72.14.204.231]:58010 "EHLO qb-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753067AbYFDNWV (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jun 2008 09:22:21 -0400 Received: by qb-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id q10so72712qbq.15 for ; Wed, 04 Jun 2008 06:22:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <484694C1.7030603@gmail.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > This patch series is a revised version of the patch series > that I sent yesterday to fix various utimensat() > non-conformances. Patches 1 and 2 are unchanged (and were > Acked by Miklos); patches 3 and 4 are revised following > comments by Miklos. D'oh! I left the "v2" markers off the resent patchs 1 and 3, so they got the same subject lines as yesterday's versions. Sorry about that!