From: Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@gmail.com>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] fsfreeze: wait in killable state in __sb_start_write
Date: Sat, 04 May 2013 08:49:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5184AF95.9060604@gmail.com> (raw)
Added a new enum to decide if we want to sleep in uninterruptible or
killable state or we want simply to return immediately.
Signed-off-by: Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
fs/super.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------
include/linux/fs.h | 19 +++++++++++++------
2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/super.c b/fs/super.c
index 7465d43..6b70c7f 100644
--- a/fs/super.c
+++ b/fs/super.c
@@ -1190,14 +1190,25 @@ static void acquire_freeze_lock(struct super_block *sb, int level, bool trylock,
* This is an internal function, please use sb_start_{write,pagefault,intwrite}
* instead.
*/
-int __sb_start_write(struct super_block *sb, int level, bool wait)
+int __sb_start_write(struct super_block *sb, int level, int wait)
{
+ int ret = 0;
retry:
if (unlikely(sb->s_writers.frozen >= level)) {
- if (!wait)
- return 0;
- wait_event(sb->s_writers.wait_unfrozen,
- sb->s_writers.frozen < level);
+ switch (wait) {
+ case FREEZE_NOWAIT:
+ return ret;
+ case FREEZE_WAIT:
+ wait_event(sb->s_writers.wait_unfrozen,
+ sb->s_writers.frozen < level);
+ break;
+ case FREEZE_WAIT_KILLABLE:
+ ret = wait_event_killable(sb->s_writers.wait_unfrozen,
+ sb->s_writers.frozen < level);
+ if (ret)
+ return -EINTR;
+ break;
+ }
}
#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
@@ -1213,7 +1224,8 @@ retry:
__sb_end_write(sb, level);
goto retry;
}
- return 1;
+ ret = 1;
+ return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__sb_start_write);
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index e8cd6b8..6d9bcef 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -1220,6 +1220,13 @@ enum {
#define SB_FREEZE_LEVELS (SB_FREEZE_COMPLETE - 1)
+/* Possible waiting modes */
+enum {
+ FREEZE_NOWAIT = 0, /* no blocking call */
+ FREEZE_WAIT = 1, /* wait in uninterruptible state */
+ FREEZE_WAIT_KILLABLE = 2, /* wait in killable state */
+};
+
struct sb_writers {
/* Counters for counting writers at each level */
struct percpu_counter counter[SB_FREEZE_LEVELS];
@@ -1335,7 +1342,7 @@ extern struct timespec current_fs_time(struct super_block *sb);
*/
void __sb_end_write(struct super_block *sb, int level);
-int __sb_start_write(struct super_block *sb, int level, bool wait);
+int __sb_start_write(struct super_block *sb, int level, int wait);
/**
* sb_end_write - drop write access to a superblock
@@ -1394,12 +1401,12 @@ static inline void sb_end_intwrite(struct super_block *sb)
*/
static inline void sb_start_write(struct super_block *sb)
{
- __sb_start_write(sb, SB_FREEZE_WRITE, true);
+ __sb_start_write(sb, SB_FREEZE_WRITE, FREEZE_WAIT);
}
static inline int sb_start_write_trylock(struct super_block *sb)
{
- return __sb_start_write(sb, SB_FREEZE_WRITE, false);
+ return __sb_start_write(sb, SB_FREEZE_WRITE, FREEZE_NOWAIT);
}
/**
@@ -1423,7 +1430,7 @@ static inline int sb_start_write_trylock(struct super_block *sb)
*/
static inline void sb_start_pagefault(struct super_block *sb)
{
- __sb_start_write(sb, SB_FREEZE_PAGEFAULT, true);
+ __sb_start_write(sb, SB_FREEZE_PAGEFAULT, FREEZE_WAIT);
}
/*
@@ -1441,7 +1448,7 @@ static inline void sb_start_pagefault(struct super_block *sb)
*/
static inline void sb_start_intwrite(struct super_block *sb)
{
- __sb_start_write(sb, SB_FREEZE_FS, true);
+ __sb_start_write(sb, SB_FREEZE_FS, FREEZE_WAIT);
}
@@ -2224,7 +2231,7 @@ static inline void file_start_write(struct file *file)
{
if (!S_ISREG(file_inode(file)->i_mode))
return;
- __sb_start_write(file_inode(file)->i_sb, SB_FREEZE_WRITE, true);
+ __sb_start_write(file_inode(file)->i_sb, SB_FREEZE_WRITE, FREEZE_WAIT);
}
static inline void file_end_write(struct file *file)
--
1.7.3.4
next reply other threads:[~2013-05-04 6:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-04 6:49 Marco Stornelli [this message]
2013-05-18 7:32 ` [PATCH 1/4] fsfreeze: wait in killable state in __sb_start_write Marco
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-07-04 16:15 Gmail
2013-04-26 8:49 Marco Stornelli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5184AF95.9060604@gmail.com \
--to=marco.stornelli@gmail.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).