From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Liu Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fs/ocfs2: use list_for_each_entry() instead of list_for_each() Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 13:01:30 +0800 Message-ID: <51F748AA.4060706@oracle.com> References: <1374931429-14062-1-git-send-email-yp.fangdong@gmail.com> <20130729074928.GB5053@mwanda> <20130729080606.GD5053@mwanda> <51F7E332.5010708@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Dan Carpenter , mfasheh@suse.com, jlbec@evilplan.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, sunil.mushran@gmail.com, tim.gardner@canonical.com, xuejiufei@huawei.com, shencanquan@huawei.com, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Dong Fang Return-path: In-Reply-To: <51F7E332.5010708@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org Hi Dong, On 07/31/2013 12:00 AM, Dong Fang wrote: > On 07/29/2013 04:06 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote: >> Oh. It appears that nothing changed between v1 and v2. Only the CC >> list. >> >> It's probably that the list moderation on ocfs2-devel was confusing >> for non-native English speakers the patch submitter thought his >> patch was dropped. >> >> Also mailing lists should have a white list so that I don't get the >> message every single time. >> >> regards, >> dan carpenter >> > sorry about that, i just think i shoud send this patch to linux-fsdevel, > but ./get_maintainer.pl didn't tell me It's better to send this patch to ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com only, as this is a specific patch for OCFS2. Also, we tag OCFS2 kernel patch with "ocfs2" in subject line rather than "fs/ocfs2". Thanks, -Jeff